Log for #openttd on 18th December 2016:
Times are UTC Toggle Colours
00:08:41  <lorran78> i installed all tools to compile
00:09:03  <lorran78> how can i use make with makefile from the grf source?
00:28:46  *** Biolunar has joined #openttd
00:46:25  <lorran78> i have that error with "make --makefile=(file)" ->"/bin/bash: cc: command not found"
00:52:38  <glx> means it didn't find cc.exe
00:52:59  <glx> I think you can edit makefile to use gcc instead
00:57:53  <lorran78> oh i see :p
00:58:49  <glx> and usually "make" should be enough, unless your makefile is not "makefile"
00:58:50  <lorran78> hum how can i recognise the line with cc error?
01:00:34  <glx> I guess it's around .pnml stuff
01:00:46  <glx> gcc is used to preprocess
01:06:46  *** crem_ has joined #openttd
01:08:26  *** crem has quit IRC
01:12:33  <lorran78> it's in a pnml you mean or in makefile where pnml is written?
01:14:20  <lorran78> after that error i have "make: *** [mynewgrf.nml] Error 127"
01:15:49  <glx> I'm not a nml specialist, maybe ask tomorrow when they are awake
01:17:04  *** gelignite_ has joined #openttd
01:17:56  <lorran78> hum okay :)
01:18:04  <lorran78> i have a strange question now :p
01:19:20  <lorran78> is it possible to put the item transmiter (non destructible item) in the construction item (to prevent some place from industries arrival)
01:19:32  <lorran78> and so make it destructible :p
01:19:47  <glx> you can buy land
01:19:59  <lorran78> ah
01:20:06  <lorran78> and then destroy things?
01:20:19  <lorran78> even non destructible?
01:21:38  <glx> I can't remember if magic bulldozer can remove undestructible stuff
01:22:33  <glx>
01:22:47  <lorran78> magic bulldozer haha :p
01:23:11  <glx> but it's highly recommended to only have it activated on paused game :)
01:23:51  <glx> <-- with pictures
01:24:08  <lorran78> cool :p
01:24:17  *** gelignite has quit IRC
01:24:17  <lorran78> how put this in game?
01:24:24  <lorran78> grf too?
01:24:45  <glx> top of the page in second link
01:26:12  *** Progman has quit IRC
01:26:26  <lorran78> hum
01:26:39  <lorran78> then maybe it will be easier to cheat to back in time lol
01:26:45  <lorran78> and then have the first train :p
01:40:22  *** lorran78 has quit IRC
01:54:59  *** lorran78 has joined #openttd
01:55:13  <lorran78> i was kicked ? :)
01:57:45  *** crem has joined #openttd
01:58:57  *** crem_ has quit IRC
02:00:32  <glx> no, when you are kicked you know it
02:01:10  *** lorran78 was kicked by DorpsGek (just a test)
02:10:39  *** sim-al2 is now known as Guest204
02:10:40  *** sim-al2 has joined #openttd
02:15:07  *** Guest204 has quit IRC
02:54:59  *** JohnnyWing has quit IRC
03:20:16  *** JohnnyWing has joined #openttd
03:20:19  *** JohnnyWing has left #openttd
03:20:44  *** JohnnyWing has joined #openttd
03:25:45  *** gelignite_ has quit IRC
03:35:05  *** JohnnyWing has quit IRC
03:40:33  *** glx has quit IRC
03:53:25  *** Biolunar_ has joined #openttd
04:00:24  *** Biolunar has quit IRC
04:10:21  *** _Fatmice_ has joined #openttd
04:10:33  *** HerzogDeXtEr has quit IRC
04:11:59  *** maciozo has quit IRC
04:15:24  *** Fatmice has quit IRC
04:32:12  *** Fatmice has joined #openttd
04:37:12  *** _Fatmice_ has quit IRC
05:24:37  *** chomwitt3 has joined #openttd
05:31:04  *** chomwitt2 has quit IRC
05:53:19  *** tokai has quit IRC
05:53:45  *** tokai has joined #openttd
05:53:45  *** ChanServ sets mode: +v tokai
07:07:43  *** sla_ro|master has joined #openttd
07:56:34  *** andythenorth has joined #openttd
08:02:53  *** Alberth has joined #openttd
08:02:53  *** ChanServ sets mode: +o Alberth
08:05:37  <andythenorth> lo Alberth
08:06:29  *** efess has quit IRC
08:08:15  *** BluesInTheNet has joined #openttd
08:13:06  <Alberth> moin
08:21:39  *** sim-al2 has quit IRC
09:12:16  <andythenorth> coop jenkins hates me :)
09:12:28  <andythenorth> I have pushed a branch that I know won’t build there
09:15:33  *** lorran78 has joined #openttd
09:17:59  <lorran78> hello Alberth :p
09:20:17  *** Supercheese has quit IRC
09:20:49  <lorran78> i have almost done my new grf from opengfx+ trains, i installed all tools to compile a new nml but now i have problem with using "make" it says "cc" not found something like that
09:21:22  <Alberth> ok
09:21:25  <andythenorth> paste the error?
09:21:26  <lorran78> don't know where change cc to gcc someone told me to do that
09:21:36  <lorran78> okay wait
09:21:55  <Alberth>  windows?
09:22:45  <Alberth> oh, maybe it works anyway..  try    CC=gcc make
09:23:04  <lorran78> i am compiling :p
09:23:18  <lorran78> lol seems the space in the folder was a prob
09:23:25  <lorran78> wait
09:23:31  <lorran78> even with " "
09:23:47  <lorran78> maybe ok now it's processing
09:24:06  <Alberth> yeah, filenames with spaces are confusing, don't know why people do that
09:24:21  <lorran78> juste "my documents" :p
09:24:30  <lorran78> because i put the whole folder
09:24:54  <lorran78> is it normal it doesn't use cache anymore?
09:25:04  <Alberth> it's still confusing, if you list the contents at a console you get "my" "documents"
09:25:12  <Alberth> now do you have 2 files or just one?
09:25:18  <lorran78> wait
09:25:28  <Alberth> nope :)
09:26:48  <lorran78> make --makefile=makefile then it seems the command "nmlc opengfx+trains.nml" automatic
09:27:27  <lorran78> and it's longer because it doesn't use cache anymore
09:27:46  <lorran78> processing... i hope it will be ok
09:30:23  <Alberth> have a tea or coffee while you let the machine compute
09:31:12  <lorran78> okay
09:35:48  <andythenorth> it _should_ use the nml cache after the first run
09:35:51  <andythenorth> which is faster
09:36:04  <andythenorth> there are some notes about make being slow under mingw also
09:36:09  <andythenorth> no known solution
09:37:03  <lorran78> yes but not this time the cache
09:37:04  <lorran78> but !
09:37:14  <lorran78> i have my first grf i think :p
09:37:25  <lorran78> i go test :p
09:38:02  <lorran78> make made me a folder with the new grf inside
09:38:11  <lorran78> and the grf and a tar file
09:39:34  <lorran78> :(
09:39:41  <lorran78> my changes don't work :(
09:39:53  <lorran78> but the grf is not same size
09:40:03  <lorran78> hum
09:40:33  <Alberth> sure you don't load the old one?
09:40:54  <Alberth> run openttd with   -d grf=4
09:41:08  <Alberth> gives a dump of where it finds/loads grfs
09:41:29  <Alberth> you may want to save output to a file :)
09:41:47  <lorran78> should i remove the old nml file in the folder?
09:42:02  <lorran78> i saw no new nml was created is it normal?
09:42:08  <Alberth> nml doesn't matter, openttd doesn't know nml
09:42:17  <lorran78> but make prog?
09:42:45  <Alberth> oh, make checks if one of its sources has changed, if not, it skips rebuilding the same file again
09:43:28  <Alberth> but it's safe to either 'touch' one source file, or delete the destination file
09:43:33  <Alberth> make will rebuild it
09:44:00  <lorran78> ok
09:44:57  <Alberth> you can ask make why it skips things, but output is usually too long to read :)
09:45:07  <andythenorth> @seen frosch123
09:45:07  <DorpsGek> andythenorth: frosch123 was last seen in #openttd 14 hours, 35 minutes, and 58 seconds ago: <frosch123> night
09:45:41  <Alberth> it's not even afternoon yet!
09:46:25  <andythenorth> 14 hours is plenty of sleeping time :)
09:48:02  <lorran78> if i delete the nml file then i have error
09:48:29  <lorran78> [CPP] ogfx-trains.nml /bin/bash: cc: command not found make: *** [ogfx-trains.nml] Error 127
09:48:43  <Alberth> sounds about right
09:49:00  <lorran78> but it's not my nml only my pnml :p
09:49:16  <lorran78> nevermind  or something wrong?
09:49:22  <Alberth> it concluded it needs to run the C pre-preprocessor again to construct the nml file from its *.pnml sources
09:49:36  <Alberth> except you don't have a 'cc' for that
09:49:54  <Alberth> does     CC=gcc make --makefile=makefile    work?
09:50:21  <Alberth> CC=gcc basically says "for cc, use gcc"
09:50:37  <lorran78> it's strange when i have the original nml file there is no more "cc" error
09:50:47  <Alberth> no it's not
09:50:59  <Alberth> it checks time stamps of all *.pnml files
09:51:10  <Alberth> it checks timestamp of the destination .nml
09:51:32  <Alberth> if the latter is younger than all the former, it skips building the nml
09:51:41  <lorran78> oh okay
09:51:42  <Alberth> and never reaches the point of needing cc
09:52:14  <lorran78> but i deleted the pnml which was near the nml
09:52:30  <lorran78> ogfx-trains.pnml(something like that)
09:52:47  <lorran78> now it used the cache
09:53:08  <Alberth> no doubt make looked for a way to create that file again, and failed
09:54:10  <Alberth> maybe it pulled the file from the VCS :)
09:56:11  <lorran78> hum i downloaded all grf from online content and i can't find them
09:56:12  *** Wolf01 has joined #openttd
09:56:20  <Alberth> hola
09:56:32  <Wolf01> o/
09:56:41  <Alberth> all grf?  that's pretty useless
09:56:50  <lorran78> where are the downloaded grf?
09:56:58  <Alberth> you likely only need a few
09:57:01  <lorran78> yes i know i wanted to test something :p
09:57:36  <Alberth> don't know where they are at windows, but the README file of OpenTTD can tell you
09:57:39  <lorran78> maybe i take the original grf i want to move them somewhere else
09:57:44  <lorran78> ok
09:58:27  <Alberth> if you changed grfid, you should not have a problem with existing other grfs
09:58:34  *** chomwitt3 has quit IRC
09:58:36  <Alberth> unless there is a conflict in IDs
09:59:02  <lorran78> i made my own id :p
09:59:07  <lorran78> wait i check
09:59:12  *** efess has joined #openttd
09:59:20  <Alberth> ok, so does it show up if you select it in the newgrf window?
09:59:51  <lorran78> yes i changed to MZ+0
10:00:11  <lorran78> i think i select my own but don't know how to be sure
10:01:46  <lorran78> tell me if my changes are ok to introduce the train before the original date
10:01:48  <lorran78> item(FEAT_TRAINS, kirbypaul) {     property {             sprite_id:              SPRITE_ID_NEW_TRAIN;    // We have our own sprite             misc_flags:             bitmask(TRAIN_FLAG_FLIP, TRAIN_FLAG_2CC);             introduction_date:      date(1, 1, 1); 	} 	graphics {             default:            kirbypaul_default_indepot_switch;             purchase:           kirbypaul_default_switch_gui; 	} }
10:02:15  <Alberth> use a pastebin,   like
10:02:28  <lorran78> oh yes here it's weird
10:03:27  <lorran78>
10:04:09  <Alberth> you can try a less drastic change first, like 1975 instead of 1925
10:05:09  <Alberth> hmm, you don't make a copy first?
10:06:42  <lorran78> i want to start on year 0 :p
10:06:58  *** Progman has joined #openttd
10:07:27  <lorran78> i add 100 year between all trains but no train works
10:07:45  <Wolf01> "When I open a particular page in the browser the game fps drops" "change browser"...
10:08:56  <Alberth> "When I open a browser, it eats 2GB memory"
10:09:24  <Wolf01> I have 16GB for that :P
10:09:52  <Alberth> lorran78:   well, first have something that works at all, I think :)
10:09:58  <Wolf01> Game's rendering is broken as shit (transport fever fyi)
10:10:23  *** JohnnyWing has joined #openttd
10:12:12  <andythenorth> Alberth: if game had ’Tram’ and ‘Electric Tram’…what would ‘Tram’ refer to? o_O
10:14:28  <Alberth> I'd pick the former, but I very much rely on proper naming of things
10:14:59  <andythenorth> in UK most trams would be electric by default
10:15:03  <Alberth> I can see some room for confusion there :p
10:15:07  <andythenorth> tram kind of means ‘electric’
10:15:15  <andythenorth> but ‘Non-Electric Tram’ is ugly
10:15:39  <Alberth> steam tram?
10:15:58  <Alberth> ie, it's also not "Non-maglev train"
10:16:30  <Alberth> Non-diesel-electric-monorail-maglev train
10:16:31  <Wolf01> Tram is the standard tram
10:16:38  <andythenorth> ‘Self-Propelled Tram’?
10:16:38  <Wolf01> Standard OTTD tram
10:16:46  <Wolf01> Electric, with catenary
10:17:05  <andythenorth>
10:17:11  <andythenorth> and
10:17:16  <andythenorth> try it for yourself :)
10:17:27  <Wolf01> It's the same problem about elrail
10:17:39  <andythenorth> isn’t it just
10:17:53  <Wolf01> At the beginning we had electric trains running on normal rails
10:18:01  <Wolf01> Then catenary popped out
10:18:19  <Alberth> implementing that was a mistake :)
10:18:27  <Wolf01> Now we started with catenary, then no-catenary popped out
10:19:00  <Wolf01> The right solution would have been to make catenary as infrastructure and not as another rail/road type
10:22:32  <andythenorth> that ship sailed :)
10:22:38  <andythenorth> it may or may not have been electric :P
10:24:16  <Wolf01> I tried to make it non-electric, so the electric one had to be added with grf, but frosh changed it again to electric to not break compatibility/graphics with existing grfs
10:25:26  *** ConductorCat has quit IRC
10:29:18  *** chomwitt3 has joined #openttd
10:45:03  <andythenorth> that means we need some way to refer to unpowered tramway
10:45:08  <andythenorth> “UNTR” :P
10:46:16  <Alberth> POTT (plain old tram tracks)
10:47:24  <andythenorth> :P
10:51:40  <Wolf01> stupid idiots
10:57:55  <Wolf01> also, sometimes closing OTTD (with the "X" button) while debugging it gives this error, it started to do it about a week ago and happened just one or two times after every build... should I change the web browser?
10:57:56  <__ln__> other than that, is transport fever a good game, worth the 25€?
10:58:05  <Wolf01> No, not worth 25€
10:58:10  <Wolf01> 15€ maybe
10:58:20  <Wolf01> It is a nice game
11:00:19  <Wolf01> It lacks many features even to make it work (for example you can only give load orders, no leave empty), maintainance works by replacing the whole consists, no min bank balance to autoreplace, capacities fucked up and mods try to make them worse
11:00:39  <andythenorth> early days
11:00:44  <Wolf01> "early"
11:00:56  * andythenorth would have tried something different than 3D reimplementation of Transport Tycoon
11:01:15  <andythenorth> Factorio is more ‘interesting’ than Train Fever, even though I won’t play it
11:01:47  <Wolf01> Train fever, as transport fever is just a train fever with ships and aircrafts, had some of these bug fixed, like the terrain filling half of the tunnel entrances
11:02:59  <__ln__> the plural of aircraft is aircraft unless you work in the airplane industry
11:03:36  <Wolf01> Oh, really?
11:03:40  <andythenorth> airplanes
11:03:56  <__ln__> yeah, really
11:05:38  <Wolf01> I always used aircraft as synonym of airplane
11:06:19  * andythenorth ponders a better OpenTTD
11:06:25  <andythenorth> something like:
11:06:39  <andythenorth> - all vehicles inherently moddable in game by player (as a type, not individually)
11:06:57  <andythenorth> - not much focus on cities or landscape
11:07:13  <andythenorth> - optional ‘drive the vehicles’ stupid mode
11:07:21  <Wolf01> You want a puzzle game?
11:07:22  <andythenorth> - voxels
11:07:49  <andythenorth> I had the idea before I saw Scrap Mechanic, but eh, something like Scrap Mechanic, but with a fleet of vehicles, and goals
11:08:01  <andythenorth>
11:08:43  <andythenorth> Scrap Mechanic + Euro Truck Simulator + Transport Tycoon
11:10:22  <Wolf01> That looks nice
11:11:39  <andythenorth> X + Y + Z is the worst way to explain any creative concept, ever :D
11:11:45  <__ln__> Wolf01: an aircraft can be a helicopter or a balloon
11:15:51  <Wolf01> Yes, all bops are flytz and all flytz are zops, but not all zops are bops
11:16:48  <lorran78> sorry i was afk eating :p
11:20:17  <andythenorth> eh so the roads I want in Hog are probably not the dirt roads some people envisage
11:20:31  <andythenorth> should I use HAUL? :P
11:20:47  <Wolf01> Maybe is better
11:21:13  <andythenorth>
11:22:37  <andythenorth> the local milk truck is not allowed on a haul road
11:23:40  <andythenorth> 300t trucks doing 45mph don’t mix with small types
11:26:29  <andythenorth>
11:27:52  <Wolf01> Totally truck's fault, it's always truck's fault
11:27:59  *** Wormnest has joined #openttd
11:29:38  <lorran78> re :)
11:32:06  <lorran78> i can't find all downloaded grf from inside ottd :/
11:42:39  *** lorran78_ has joined #openttd
11:43:15  <lorran78> found !
11:43:40  <lorran78> i am now sure that i test my grf and the first train is always in 1925
11:43:48  <lorran78> what have i done wrong?
11:49:39  <lorran78> i tested 1935 for the kirby but it's same windows first vehicule in 1925...
11:49:57  <lorran78> my command should work or not in the pnml?
11:58:15  <Alberth> pnml is collected into nml
11:58:19  <Alberth> open the nml file to check
11:58:48  <Alberth> I'd say the change is not working, something else is needed
11:59:12  <Alberth> unfortunately, I have no idea what, you need someone that understand newgrfs and/or nml better
11:59:33  <lorran78> hum okay :)
11:59:39  <lorran78> suppose noone here can help?
11:59:52  <andythenorth> there will be an nml file somewhere
11:59:56  <andythenorth> compiled from the pnml
12:00:06  <andythenorth> open that, and search for ‘1935’
12:00:44  <lorran78> if i have good memory alberth told me that there was no "introduction_date" in the pnml
12:00:49  <lorran78> it must be added
12:00:53  <lorran78> so i can't find it
12:00:54  <andythenorth> plausible
12:01:19  <Eddi|zuHause> lorran78: you need to install all of MinGW, not just "make"...
12:01:23  *** frosch123 has joined #openttd
12:01:33  <lorran78> hum? all?
12:01:49  <lorran78> i checked base for mingw and msys base too
12:02:05  <Eddi|zuHause> you need the compiler
12:02:15  <Eddi|zuHause> or at least the preprocessor of the compiler
12:02:21  <lorran78> ok then i check what?
12:02:23  <Eddi|zuHause> and it must be in your path
12:02:58  <andythenorth> quak
12:03:50  <lorran78> i put all in path
12:03:53  <lorran78> like explain here :
12:04:03  <lorran78>
12:06:49  <lorran78> eddi ?
12:07:00  <lorran78> i must check all in mingw then?
12:07:59  <Eddi|zuHause> lorran78: no, it's probably not in your PATH
12:08:11  <Eddi|zuHause> check at the end of that page under "common errors"
12:09:34  <frosch123> moin
12:12:27  <lorran78> i am reading and reading and i don't see what is wrong :/
12:15:34  <lorran78> i think the cc command is the problem
12:15:45  <lorran78> if i delete the nml it is missing
12:16:42  <lorran78> what line must i change to use gcc and not cc?
12:19:49  <Eddi|zuHause> what happens when you type "gcc -v" at the bash prompt?
12:21:16  <lorran78> i test
12:21:26  <lorran78> work good
12:22:16  <lorran78> should i let the pnml which is not in src folder?
12:22:30  <Eddi|zuHause> and when you type "cc -v"?
12:22:49  <lorran78> not found
12:23:20  <Eddi|zuHause> then try "CC=gcc make"
12:23:31  <andythenorth> frosch123: if you want less crap test grf
12:23:43  <andythenorth> currently splits trams / electric trams
12:23:44  <Eddi|zuHause> (note that capital C are important)
12:23:53  <andythenorth> although that might need rethinking w.r.t label and name
12:24:07  <lorran78> in dos prompt?
12:24:22  <lorran78> not possible "CC=gcc make"
12:24:29  <Eddi|zuHause> no, in bash
12:24:33  <lorran78> oh
12:24:58  <lorran78> launch waiting :p
12:30:25  <lorran78> i have new nml !
12:30:32  <lorran78> i test if it's ok :p
12:31:23  <lorran78> strange mine is smaller with all my new commands :)
12:31:37  <lorran78> i launch make --makefile makefile now for the grf
12:33:45  <lorran78> works !!!!!!!!!!!!!
12:34:19  <lorran78> i must use bash to use gcc when cc is usefull?
12:37:37  <lorran78> i had questions
12:37:51  <lorran78> is there a size limit for the cities?
12:38:55  <Alberth> all tiles of the map?
12:39:20  <lorran78> and is there a way to build non destructible buildings (i don't really want to use cheat code to destroy industries)
12:39:24  <lorran78> maybe? :)
12:40:52  <Alberth> I don't understand how "build" and "destroy" can be combined like that :)
12:40:59  <lorran78> lol
12:41:27  <lorran78> build transmiter (i think it's the name in english version)
12:41:42  <lorran78> or lighthouse
12:41:49  <Alberth> at least in the scenario editor
12:41:55  <Alberth> in-game, I don't know
12:41:59  <lorran78> okay :)
12:42:09  <Alberth> but you can build objects if you load an object grf
12:42:33  <lorran78> and i found a grf to modify industries mechanic
12:42:39  <lorran78> but it doesn't work :/
12:42:56  <lorran78> Modify_industries.grf
12:43:05  <Alberth> never heard of it
12:43:09  <lorran78> it does nothing
12:43:16  <lorran78> hum ok
12:43:18  <Alberth> unlikely :p
12:44:08  <Alberth> there is FIRS, ECS, and Yeti as alternative industry sets
12:44:31  <andythenorth> and manual industries, SPI, and Oz Industries
12:44:38  <andythenorth> and PBI
12:44:41  <Alberth> and opengfx+industries
12:44:54  <andythenorth> wow, industry sets we have :D
12:44:59  <andythenorth> canadian industries also :P
12:46:44  <andythenorth> “Haul Road” or “Heavy Haul Road”?
12:46:58  <andythenorth> the shorter one is used IRL, but longer more obvious to player?
12:50:10  <Wolf01> Remind me to spin off you grf :)
12:51:47  <andythenorth> ho NRT types show in main toolbar menu even if no vehicles :)
12:54:33  <Wolf01> We know
12:54:57  <Wolf01> I should fix that, report a bug XD
12:56:09  <andythenorth> if we tell players where the RATT build is, and where the bug tracker is
12:56:14  <andythenorth> we can avoid that work :P :)
12:57:08  * andythenorth thinks santa claus might bring a forum post
13:00:21  <Wolf01> I'm not sure about that
13:01:29  <Wolf01> I don't want suddenly people trying to make grfs with no specs and then blame us because something changed
13:03:11  <frosch123> yay, regression no longer crashes. but there is still a different result for some bridge construction
13:04:22  <Wolf01> frosch123, about the default tram, shouldn't we hardcode 2 different trams, one w/o catenary and one with?
13:04:48  <frosch123> plausible
13:05:17  <frosch123> same for road then?
13:05:28  <frosch123> ROAD ELRD TRAM ELTM
13:05:46  <Wolf01> I think not, we don't have ELRD currently
13:06:12  <frosch123> we also do not have TRAM then
13:06:31  <andythenorth> Wolf01: don’t tell them where the nml fork is :)
13:06:31  <Wolf01> But we have TRAM vehicles mixed with ELTM
13:06:52  <Wolf01> Like the early ELRL
13:06:54  <frosch123> default ottd has no trams at all :p
13:07:16  <frosch123> Wolf01: there is no way to fix existing grfs, so what do you try to achieve?
13:07:16  <andythenorth> if it’s TRAM and ELTM then ROAD and ELRD are entailed I think
13:07:17  <Wolf01> But we have existing grfs :P
13:07:33  <Wolf01> Eh, nothing :P
13:07:36  <andythenorth> urgh, I changed ELTM to ELTR because I kept mistyping it
13:07:44  <andythenorth> ELTRM doesn’t compile :P
13:07:56  <Wolf01> Just I find ugly to have ELTM as default
13:08:22  <Wolf01> andythenorth, label is 32 bit, 8 bits per char.. 4?
13:09:15  <frosch123> <- it should be somewhat consistent with railtypes :)
13:10:02  <frosch123> one could also call it DFLT and ELEC
13:10:11  <frosch123> same labels for road and tram subtypes
13:10:23  <frosch123> but meh
13:11:37  <andythenorth> it’s just a reference eh :)
13:11:47  <andythenorth> whatever it is needs to be easy to type
13:11:54  * andythenorth wondered about CATT (catenary tram)
13:11:56  <andythenorth> :P
13:12:19  <frosch123> anyway, exisiting tram grfs should default to electrified tram track
13:12:35  <frosch123> people can always toggle the transparency setting if they hate catenary
13:13:09  <Eddi|zuHause> yes, electric tram should be just "TRAM"
13:13:32  <frosch123> no, that's stupid
13:13:44  <frosch123> what would non-electrified tram then be?
13:14:12  <andythenorth> UNTR
13:14:12  <Eddi|zuHause> well, let me rephrase that... if ANYTHING should be "TRAM", then it should be electric tram
13:14:19  <andythenorth> no TRAM? o_O
13:14:36  <__ln__> what about an electrified tram that doesn't have catenary?
13:15:18  <Eddi|zuHause> __ln__: that would be WTRM (weird tram)
13:15:35  <Wolf01> Third rail tram
13:15:38  <Wolf01> TRTM
13:16:05  <__ln__> no, not third rail
13:16:16  <__ln__> for the record, the tram in Sevilla:
13:16:18  <Eddi|zuHause> Wolf01: i think there's a tram in belgium that only uses the two rails for power
13:16:28  <andythenorth> there’s one in Bordeaux that switches
13:16:34  <andythenorth> catenary / underground rail
13:16:43  <frosch123> btw. it is not required that all labels contain "RD" or "TM"
13:16:44  <Wolf01> I never paid attention, but in some cities we use that too
13:16:55  <frosch123> we already know that the labels refer to road or tram :)
13:17:29  <Wolf01> What about removing "EL*" totally and place catenary as infrastructure? (also on railroad)
13:17:39  <Eddi|zuHause> there were also some tests with induction, where you basically have the third rail underground
13:18:09  <Wolf01> Grfs might define if catenary can be built later, or not built at all, and what's the aspect
13:18:36  <frosch123> Wolf01: that fails just on the next door with 3rd rail and voltage levels and whatever stuff
13:18:43  <__ln__> the tram in Sevilla is battery-powered on a portion of its route
13:18:50  <frosch123> we already tried separate catenary, and it failed
13:18:53  <Eddi|zuHause> Wolf01: i fear that digs too dep into already existing infrastructure/UI
13:19:34  <Eddi|zuHause> __ln__: but that doesn't need a new tracktype...
13:19:44  <frosch123> also it does not fix anything about the label problem
13:19:48  <andythenorth> that’s just ‘powered'
13:20:05  <Wolf01> I started roadtypes with that idea in mind, that was the "catenary flag" which got removed
13:20:27  <__ln__> Eddi|zuHause: i guess not, but it needs a tram type which needs to have catenary on some parts of the route.
13:20:32  <frosch123> it merely adds another label for catenary type
13:20:54  <Eddi|zuHause> Wolf01: i think a flag falls short... you need new bits for catenary type and catenary trackbits
13:21:51  <Eddi|zuHause> Wolf01: because people will want to differentiate 25kV AC, 15kV AC, 3kV DC, ...
13:21:59  <Wolf01> Yes, in my implementation the entire tile was powered regardless of bits (or better the same track bits)
13:22:35  <Eddi|zuHause> (not that there are any 25kV trams)
13:23:34  * andythenorth is confused
13:23:36  <__ln__> (are you sure?)
13:23:44  <andythenorth> we just need two labels eh? :D
13:23:51  <frosch123> yep :)
13:23:58  <andythenorth> steam trams look silly with catenary up
13:24:59  <lorran78> anyway thx for help i am happy because it works :p
13:24:59  <Wolf01> Also steam trains running on elrails
13:25:30  <__ln__>
13:26:52  <andythenorth> frosch123: it’s light rail eh?  Can I just use ‘RAIL’ and ‘ELRL’? :) :P
13:27:28  <frosch123> i like that :)
13:28:21  <Wolf01> At least until you start making road+rail grfs
13:28:28  <andythenorth>
13:28:34  <Wolf01> If that's will even be possible
13:28:41  <andythenorth> then that whole tedious bunfight about labels is mostly done already
13:28:49  <andythenorth> and nobody has to ‘quit the community’ over labels :P
13:28:53  *** sim-al2 has joined #openttd
13:29:42  <frosch123> most labels abbreviate "RAIL" with "R", which also works for "ROAD" :)
13:30:11  <andythenorth> 'narrow gauge road’
13:30:22  <frosch123> happens a lot
13:30:32  <frosch123> not navigateable by articulated vehicles
13:31:33  <Wolf01> I'm still expecting canalroad/wetroad
13:32:05  <andythenorth> electric canal
13:32:25  <andythenorth> ho
13:32:29  <frosch123> canal is cominable with overhead-tram
13:36:35  *** Progman has quit IRC
13:37:00  *** FLHerne has joined #openttd
13:37:36  <Wolf01> Ha!
13:38:26  <andythenorth> so I should change RH to use RAIL and ELRL eh?
13:39:01  <frosch123> ROAD, ELRD, RAIL, ELRL ?
13:39:36  <andythenorth> +1
13:51:59  *** sla_ro|master has quit IRC
14:25:50  <Wolf01> I've been staring at VS for 1 hour...
14:26:24  <frosch123> maybe listen to AS for the next hour then
14:27:03  <V453000> ASS
14:28:25  <Wolf01> Time to do somethinh, like fixing non-drive-through roadstops or disabling building menu if no vehicle has been found
14:28:44  <frosch123> pull before you do that
14:29:08  <frosch123> i think i did both :p
14:29:14  <Wolf01> Lol
14:31:16  <Wolf01> Ok, there's still this one:
14:32:00  <Wolf01> Missing a diagdir somewhere
14:32:14  <frosch123> you need to check the command callback for that
14:32:29  <frosch123> it likely extracts the direction from p1 and p2, which got changed
14:35:50  <Wolf01> Let's try changing a random 6 to a 3
14:36:25  <Wolf01> Seem to work
14:51:38  *** Gja has joined #openttd
14:53:14  <andythenorth> so eh
14:53:31  <andythenorth> how do I make some vehicles compatible to both ROAD and HAUL?
14:53:35  <Wolf01> Mmmh, why I can't merge from ratt? It says it's already up to date... how it can be?
14:53:41  <andythenorth> I have to define a third type, which provides the compatibility?
14:54:02  <Wolf01> Or define HAUL as compatible with road?
14:54:22  <frosch123> it depends whether all HAUL vehicles are compatible, or just one
14:54:27  <Wolf01> But you don't want milk delivery trucks to run on it
14:54:32  <andythenorth> HAUL vehicles are HAUL only
14:54:39  <andythenorth> ROAD vehicles are ROAD only
14:54:44  <andythenorth> but Supplies Trucks can go on both
14:55:00  <frosch123> OFFR then
14:55:26  <andythenorth> ok, and I don’t need to define that as an actual type?
14:55:34  <andythenorth> just put it in the relevant compatibility props?
14:55:50  <Wolf01> I'm still of the idea ROAD vehs are compatible with all types (mainly for compatibility), maybe not for wetroads
14:56:26  <andythenorth> no schoolbuses on my mining road :P
14:56:38  <andythenorth> maybe I miss something, dunno
14:56:51  <Wolf01> And if I want to build a school near the mine?
14:56:53  <frosch123> i am not entirely sure :)
14:58:30  <Wolf01> Also I want roads traversable only for certain vehicles, like only buses but no freight vehicles
14:59:02  <andythenorth> I never did understand railtypes compatibility :D
14:59:06  <Wolf01> So I'll shit them on all the cities to keep trucks outside
14:59:15  <andythenorth> oh like a city truck ban? o_O
14:59:19  <Wolf01> Yes
14:59:29  * andythenorth considered something like that before
14:59:38  <andythenorth> I thought it might be too restrictive to be fun, but yeah
14:59:41  <andythenorth> no trucks in towns
14:59:45  <andythenorth> would be a thing
14:59:49  <Wolf01> I hate when 40+ trucks pile up behing a bus
15:00:00  <Wolf01> *behind
15:00:07  <andythenorth> not sure how it would be done
15:00:14  <Wolf01> Neither do I
15:00:16  <Wolf01> :D
15:00:21  <andythenorth> ideally, persuade towns to build a dedicated town roadtype :P
15:00:33  <Wolf01> With dynamite?
15:01:00  <Wolf01> Most of my towns don't even own their roads :P
15:01:01  *** HerzogDeXtEr has joined #openttd
15:01:31  <frosch123> so that would enforce servicing shops and bank by helicopter?
15:02:31  <Wolf01> Maybe you can just leave *some* roads to be used
15:02:40  <Wolf01> But not every single road
15:03:45  <andythenorth> exception for town trucks
15:04:01  <Wolf01> Define town trucks
15:04:17  <andythenorth> mail, armoured, food, building materials, goods, beer
15:04:22  <andythenorth> :P
15:04:49  <Wolf01> Eh.. and if I make a goods truck with a 300t one?
15:05:13  <Wolf01> Max speed 12kmh
15:05:29  <Wolf01> Threaded
15:07:10  <Wolf01> The problem might be when an industry near the town will be eaten as the town grows, but since it's you which make "no-truck" roads, it's your fault if you wall in the industry
15:08:32  <Wolf01> I would give a look on 4 lanes roads, sure it will break all the graphics and might need transition tiles for other roadtypes
15:11:06  *** sla_ro|master has joined #openttd
15:12:40  <Wolf01> Ok, synced the convert-road branch
15:12:43  *** sla_ro|master has quit IRC
15:12:55  *** gelignite has joined #openttd
15:13:44  <andythenorth> compatibility breaks my brain
15:13:54  <andythenorth> I’m sure Eddi explained to me once that it isn’t possible
15:17:06  <Wolf01> Yes, I know -> TODO: check for roadtype compatibility
15:18:21  <andythenorth> I have NFI how to have a vehicle that can go on multiple labels
15:18:26  *** sla_ro|master has joined #openttd
15:18:33  <andythenorth> as vehicle compatibility is defined by the type, not by the vehicle
15:18:53  <andythenorth> so I have to define some ‘universal’ road or something
15:21:34  <Wolf01> frosch123, did you remove the "compatible_roadtypes" variable?
15:22:08  <Wolf01> I mean from RoadTypeInfo
15:23:07  <andythenorth> uses powered instead
15:23:26  <andythenorth> they’re synonymous for RVs as there are no unpowered wagons
15:24:24  <Wolf01> So I only check if the new roadtype will be powered?
15:25:01  <Wolf01> Unpow->pow yes; pow->pow yes; pow->unpow no
15:25:22  <Wolf01> Third-rail -> catenary?
15:25:32  <Wolf01> Or the contrary
15:35:20  <andythenorth> dunno :)
15:35:24  <andythenorth> don’t understand :)
15:36:18  <andythenorth> the railtypes compatibility spec is…'interesting'
15:36:36  <andythenorth> it looks like something that was designed by very clever people
15:37:02  <andythenorth> I wish they were still around to explain it to us :)
15:38:22  <andythenorth> peter1139: how do railtypes work then? o_O
15:47:57  <frosch123> so, do we have a list of real use cases?
15:48:14  <frosch123> i only read about use-cases which have some corner case where it does not work :p
15:48:58  <peter1139> hi
15:49:00  <peter1139> they don't work
15:49:10  <peter1139> tron did it
15:49:32  <peter1139> (so they do work, but only tron understands it)
15:50:00  <Wolf01> Let's hunt for tron :D
15:50:05  <andythenorth> frosch123: 1. roadtype specifying no other compatible types [works]
15:50:36  <andythenorth> 2. roadtype specifying some other compatible types [so RAIL trams work on ELRL, for example] [works]
15:51:35  <andythenorth> 3. vehicle that is mutually compatible between otherwise incompatible type [can’t see how to do that]
15:51:59  <peter1139> andythenorth, iirc the compatibility stuff works backward to how you'd expect
15:52:03  <andythenorth> ass backward
15:52:12  <peter1139> i certainly remember getting confused when dealing with it
15:52:30  <andythenorth> it’s built for rocket scientists
15:52:41  <andythenorth> the railtype specificies the behaviour of the vehicles
15:52:48  <andythenorth> which is super logical, but just not intuitive
15:53:34  <Wolf01> Btw... I'm now able to convert: 1. *->red; 2. [normal, yellow]->blue; 3. *->yellow... no [*]->normal
15:55:23  <Wolf01> I think some road was defined as electric even if it doesn't have the catenary
15:55:30  <Wolf01> Or I might have switched the checks
15:56:30  <andythenorth> I’m 99% certain that case 3 (vehicles compatible between 2 otherwise incompatible types) can’t be done
15:56:35  *** tokai has quit IRC
15:56:45  <andythenorth> I’m sure Eddi|zuHause explained that it’s why we can’t have mixed gauge trains
15:58:10  <Eddi|zuHause> we can have mixed gauge trains if you define a mixed gauge railtype
15:58:44  <Eddi|zuHause> the railtype says which vehicles it's compatible with, not the vehicle says which railtypes it's compatible with
15:58:55  <Wolf01> Ok, switching the checks, *->road, [yellow, red]->blue, [blue, red]->yellow, yellow->red
15:59:36  <Wolf01> So it was better before
16:00:44  *** tokai has joined #openttd
16:00:44  *** ChanServ sets mode: +v tokai
16:01:01  <andythenorth> so how would I define a vehicle compatible with HAUL and ROAD?
16:01:10  <andythenorth> when HAUL and ROAD are not compatible
16:02:19  <Eddi|zuHause> you can't. either you make HAUL compatible with ROAD (one way or the other) or you define a mixed type...
16:02:59  <Eddi|zuHause> a vehicle only has exactly one roadtype. the roadtypes then discuss amongst themselves whether to allow that vehicle on them, based on that one type.
16:03:58  <andythenorth> yup
16:04:05  <andythenorth> ok so that is what it is
16:04:10  <andythenorth> I’ll stop trying to implement it
16:05:21  <Eddi|zuHause> what would occasionally be useful is that two articulated parts could have different POWERED type
16:05:28  <Eddi|zuHause> (not COMPATIBLE)
16:05:39  <Wolf01> Not our case
16:06:12  <Wolf01> At least if someone finds a way to make a trolleybus with a diesel engine too
16:06:14  <Eddi|zuHause> so you could make like electric/diesel hybrid vehicles, or something
16:06:22  <Wolf01> *articulated trolleybus
16:06:42  <Eddi|zuHause> currently articulated parts must have the exact same type
16:07:17  <Eddi|zuHause> (or it's actually ignored, not sure)
16:14:10  *** tokai has quit IRC
16:16:20  <peter1139> iirc power is ignored for articulated parts
16:23:52  <andythenorth> it is for RVs definitely
16:24:49  *** maciozo has joined #openttd
16:27:14  <andythenorth> so I need two kinds of supplies truck, and transfers
16:29:25  <andythenorth>
16:30:38  <frosch123> i think in your case i would use ROAD, OFFR, HAUL
16:31:00  <frosch123> ROAD is normal road, OFFR is trails, HAUL is specifically designed for heavy vehicles
16:31:32  <frosch123> OFFR vehicles can drive on all three
16:31:38  <frosch123> ROAD and HAUL vehicles can only drive on themself
16:31:53  <andythenorth> works, but puts a type in the build menu I don’t otherwise need or want :)
16:32:17  <andythenorth> I think the solution is to drop the idea of multi-compatible supplies trucks
16:32:19  <frosch123> i thought trails were the main usecase :p
16:32:28  <andythenorth> in 2008 :)
16:32:45  <andythenorth> ‘now we have experience’ :P
16:32:59  <frosch123> anyway, i am not sure how the introduction works yet
16:33:21  <frosch123> can a rv be available without the tracktype being available yet?
16:34:17  <Wolf01> <andythenorth> works, but puts a type in the build menu I don’t otherwise need or want :) <- only if you define a roadtype grf, not with just vehicles... btw, if you load a vehicle grf with no specific roadtype defined, what could happen? Defaults to ROAD?
16:34:49  <andythenorth> defaults to ROAD
16:34:54  <andythenorth> that’s tested in Road Hog
16:35:46  <andythenorth> if I wanted an OFFR type, I’d have to define a buildable OFFR type, simply adding a label to table + vehicles doesn’t work
16:36:21  <andythenorth> powered (compatibility) list is for a different thing, so that’s no use
16:36:27  <andythenorth> and fallback is for a different thing also
16:36:54  <andythenorth> this use case is not essential, and I worry it’s a bit of a misleading rabbit hole :)
16:37:42  <andythenorth> frosch123: from docs I can’t understand which has priority, vehicle introduction or tracktype introduction
16:38:27  <frosch123> i would also have to read railtype docs :)
16:38:54  <frosch123> and then probably create a chart like
16:40:28  <andythenorth> burn it all with fire :)
16:42:49  <frosch123> anyway, you can now have separate (global) hotkeys for building tram
16:42:54  *** Biolunar_ has quit IRC
16:43:01  <andythenorth> yay
16:43:12  <andythenorth> that is more important than it might sound
16:43:40  * andythenorth needs some haul road sprites
16:43:53  <frosch123> isn't it just grey stone?
16:45:25  <andythenorth> American Roads dirt roads will do
16:45:29  <andythenorth> for now
16:45:44  <andythenorth> I think ‘not brown’ is probably better in a future version
16:46:07  <andythenorth> oh, they’re all integrated with the terrain :P
16:46:08  <andythenorth> oops
16:46:25  <andythenorth> I’ll draw soem
16:47:13  <Wolf01> Also pedestrian roads would be cool, they should disable any other feature than building road :P
16:48:22  *** tokai has joined #openttd
16:48:22  *** ChanServ sets mode: +v tokai
16:49:01  <frosch123> Wolf01: you can do that with the oneway stuff
16:49:06  <frosch123> it also allows noway
16:49:12  <Wolf01> But it's ugly
16:50:02  <Wolf01> <- I mean something like this
16:53:29  <andythenorth> objects?
16:54:31  <Wolf01> I'll do pedestrians as vehicles
16:54:51  <andythenorth> I wondered :)
16:54:52  <andythenorth> capacity?
16:54:54  <Wolf01> Which could use any other road and transport 1 goods
16:54:59  <Wolf01> Or 1 food
16:55:20  <Wolf01> Not 2 because the other hand is bus with the smartphone
16:55:28  <Wolf01> *busy
16:56:20  <Wolf01> Pedestrian which can carry pax would be too weird :D
16:57:49  <andythenorth> so trams without catenary eh
16:58:01  <andythenorth> I will need some more sprites
17:06:26  *** Fatmice has quit IRC
17:09:27  *** HerzogDeXtEr1 has joined #openttd
17:15:51  *** HerzogDeXtEr has quit IRC
17:29:40  <andythenorth> do we need a disable_[types] list?
17:29:49  <andythenorth> oh nvm
17:29:55  * andythenorth being stupid
17:45:28  <andythenorth> frosch123, Wolf01
17:45:46  <andythenorth> updated, adds a second road type and some vehicles for it
17:45:55  <andythenorth> also corrected some strings, and changed some labels
17:51:09  <Wolf01> Trying
17:58:00  <Wolf01> Btw, it's not clear you have to bridge/tunnel a ROAD to cross it with the HAUL one
17:58:35  <Wolf01> Building roadbits on ROAD when building HAUL should be forbidden
17:59:44  <andythenorth> do we need to do that in newgrf, or in ottd?
17:59:50  <frosch123> ottd
17:59:59  * andythenorth wonders how much more nml patching is left
18:00:10  <andythenorth> I haven’t tested the callbacks (haven’t even looked at them) :P
18:00:12  <frosch123> when adding roadbits with a different type, it needs to pick the more-compatible roadtype, or reject it completely
18:00:14  <frosch123> as for ail
18:00:32  <frosch123> rail + elrail -> elrail, elrail + rail -> elrail, rail + mono -> reject
18:00:45  <andythenorth> ok
18:00:52  * andythenorth wonders if nml needs tests adding for these types
18:01:07  <frosch123> nml needs to learn some more roadtypeflags, otherwise it is done
18:01:38  <andythenorth> the railtype test (008) is pretty sparse eh?
18:01:38  <frosch123> the yellow/red stuff is already good
18:02:01  <andythenorth> once nml is done, we could merge the fork?
18:02:12  <andythenorth> currently I’ve broken the jenkins build of RH, as it needs forked nml
18:02:16  <frosch123> it needs some review
18:02:19  <andythenorth> yup
18:02:20  <frosch123> same for ottd
18:02:33  <frosch123> every now and then there is a mixup of basetype and subtype
18:02:35  <frosch123> or some negation
18:02:50  <frosch123> many of the fixes are actually adding or removing "!"
18:03:48  <frosch123> also i am a fan of vcs history that tells you something more than trial and error :)
18:05:02  *** slaca has joined #openttd
18:05:37  <andythenorth> wouldn’t we just bin the current commits, and make a new set of patches for nml?
18:05:47  <andythenorth> seems cleaner
18:05:48  <frosch123> yep
18:06:39  <andythenorth> got Road Vehicle twice :)
18:07:59  <andythenorth> don’t _think_ that’s in the grf
18:08:05  <andythenorth> afaict
18:08:19  <frosch123> you likely forgot to set a name
18:08:22  <frosch123> so it took the default
18:08:32  <andythenorth> I’ve only defined one roadtype
18:08:39  <andythenorth> the Heavy Haul Road
18:08:48  <andythenorth> and two tramtypes
18:09:23  * andythenorth experiments
18:18:39  *** frosch123 has quit IRC
18:21:25  *** glx has joined #openttd
18:21:25  *** ChanServ sets mode: +v glx
18:27:27  *** Progman has joined #openttd
18:38:00  *** maciozo has quit IRC
18:42:29  *** Progman_ has joined #openttd
18:43:24  *** Progman has quit IRC
18:43:26  *** Progman_ is now known as Progman
18:45:45  <DorpsGek> Commit by translators :: r27698 /trunk/src/lang (russian.txt spanish.txt) (2016-12-18 19:45:38 +0100 )
18:45:46  <DorpsGek> -Update from Eints:
18:45:47  <DorpsGek> spanish: 3 changes by SilverSurferZzZ
18:45:48  <DorpsGek> russian: 3 changes by Lone_Wolf
18:55:08  <_dp_> hi! can a newgrf disable railtypes in other grf?
18:57:18  *** Supercheese has joined #openttd
18:58:47  *** umgeher_ has joined #openttd
19:02:24  *** umgeher has quit IRC
19:10:59  <Eddi|zuHause> no, you can only disable the other grf
19:11:12  <Eddi|zuHause> which is a total dick move, btw.
19:13:56  <_dp_> My only objective is to configure server the way I want it, so I have an easier way of disabling grfs
19:14:28  <Wolf01> Check if the other grf has parameters
19:15:01  <_dp_> It has one, but it's not the one I want :(
19:15:28  <Eddi|zuHause> best way to configure server grfs is to upload a savegame which you set up and checked locally
19:16:32  <_dp_> then I won't be able to generate more games with same settings
19:16:42  <_dp_> besides I can't even do it locally
19:22:14  <Wolf01> I usually configure the server locally then upload the config, so I can generate new games
19:24:29  <_dp_> I have a nice web interface for configuring servers
19:24:43  <Wolf01> I don't
19:24:49  <_dp_> Sadly it just seems impossible to do what I want in any way
19:46:52  *** slaca has quit IRC
19:49:28  *** Gja has quit IRC
19:50:05  <Eddi|zuHause> you can save the savegame's newgrf config as a preset, to use in other games
19:55:34  <_dp_> whatever, I know how to configure servers :p
19:56:02  <_dp_> I don't know how to disable railtypes :(
19:56:32  <Wolf01> You can't
19:56:43  <_dp_> I can even disable engines, but it won't help here because nuts have universal engines
19:57:41  <Wolf01> Maybe if you just say what you want exactly someone could work it out...
19:58:21  <_dp_> exactly I want to disable normal rail types in nuts and leave only purr rails)
19:58:39  <Wolf01> V453000, ping
19:59:40  <_dp_> In general though I want to create some cool christmas setup and that was just one of ideas for it...
20:09:14  <V453000> `wat
20:09:41  <Wolf01> Read last lines
20:09:46  <V453000> disable railtypes, why?
20:09:58  <V453000> running out of IDs?
20:10:13  <Wolf01> Because "why not?"
20:11:56  <_dp_> several reasons
20:12:25  <V453000> nuts will definitely get at least one more update eventually
20:12:31  <_dp_> most important one is that I don't undestand why are they even there)
20:12:36  <V453000> so if you give me reasons I might consider them
20:12:56  <_dp_> and they are cheaper so you have to use them for start and then go through all the hassle of replacing them
20:13:00  <V453000> well having an universal rail is generally useful
20:13:19  <V453000> having colours is just nice
20:13:20  <_dp_> also they use different background in my setup for some reason
20:13:28  <V453000> and can be interesting for specific setups
20:13:39  <V453000> different background?
20:13:55  *** maciozo has joined #openttd
20:14:00  <_dp_> yeah, wait a sec I'll set it up on a server
20:17:37  * andythenorth wonders how FIRS works 
20:19:44  <_dp_> V453000, check citymania test server
20:20:00  <_dp_> normal raitypes use default climate ground
20:20:18  <_dp_> while purr ones use grf background (that I want)
20:20:47  <V453000> sounds like non nuts issue but let's see
20:21:22  <_dp_> mb but still
20:21:38  <_dp_> in fact I may even be able to fix it by changing some sprites
20:37:24  <Eddi|zuHause> _dp_: i think your best approach here is to modify the grf to your needs, and then get permission to distribute it
20:51:47  *** tokai has quit IRC
20:52:13  <_dp_> Eddi|zuHause, mb... but I still hope there is smth better)
20:52:41  * andythenorth deletes things
20:52:50  *** tokai has joined #openttd
20:52:51  *** ChanServ sets mode: +v tokai
20:53:32  <_dp_> for now I'm stuck on installing nmlc though :(
20:55:15  <_dp_> best I got so far is that in installs fine and then can't find ply
20:55:24  <_dp_> which I think I have for all possible python versions
20:55:37  <andythenorth> what OS?
20:55:44  <_dp_> linux
20:55:55  <andythenorth> using pip?
20:56:00  <_dp_> yes
20:56:04  <andythenorth> hmm
20:56:17  <andythenorth> got a virtualenv?
20:56:37  <_dp_> or mb not, I think I installed in with
20:56:56  <_dp_> pip failed on egg with some weird error
20:57:08  <andythenorth> frigging python packaging :)
20:57:21  <andythenorth> substitute [python] for any other popular language also
20:57:35  <_dp_> virtualenv didn't work either
20:57:53  <andythenorth> FWIW, I use a virtualenv (for isolation of the rest of my system from localised setuptools crap)
20:58:03  <andythenorth> and then I pip install ply for python 3.2
20:58:19  <Eddi|zuHause> shouldn't you use pillow nowadays?
20:58:24  <andythenorth> I am not going to remove it and test it though, as setuptools are flakey
20:58:27  <andythenorth> ply is the lexer
20:59:23  <andythenorth> _dp_: could always do a manual install :(
20:59:48  <_dp_> nvm, just installed it in virtualenv
21:00:16  *** mikegrb_ is now known as mikegrb
21:00:16  <_dp_> first time I tried have some files created under root so was getting permission errors
21:00:41  <andythenorth> I always use virtualenv, it just prevents installs for one project crapping all over another project
21:01:39  <_dp_> yeah, I'm usually using it too, just got confused when it suddenly required root permissions
21:01:42  <andythenorth> ach are dates a word or dword? :P
21:01:46  <andythenorth> (in ottd)
21:02:31  * andythenorth doing text stack stuff again
21:02:41  *** kais58 has quit IRC
21:03:46  * _dp_ "hello world" time
21:05:29  <lorran78> rehello :p
21:06:17  <lorran78> i wanted to know if industries can pop on a object item other than original item (transmiter and lighthouse)
21:10:43  <andythenorth> ??
21:10:45  <andythenorth> :)
21:13:25  <Eddi|zuHause> andythenorth: surely the wiki knows that...
21:13:39  <andythenorth> yeah
21:19:08  <peter1139> hmm, odd
21:19:13  <peter1139> my multistop docks works
21:19:26  <peter1139> must be an edge-case issue which i don't remember
21:22:11  <andythenorth> you couldn’t figure out how/where to make ships wait?
21:22:36  <andythenorth> afaik, it was ‘mostly done’ but something boring needed doing
21:22:47  <andythenorth> and boring is boring
21:24:01  *** sla_ro|master has quit IRC
21:28:13  <__ln__> so... if one of the german states decided to declare independence, what would happen?
21:31:28  *** Alberth has left #openttd
21:36:05  <peter1139> nah it had path finding issues
21:36:08  <peter1139> but i don't remember what
21:36:46  <peter1139> possibly something to do with the dock tile not actually be traversible
21:39:53  <andythenorth> multistop docks would be…better
21:40:01  <andythenorth> or at least different
21:40:12  <peter1139> they solve some issues
21:40:26  <peter1139> i wasn't intending on making ships solid at any point though
21:40:44  <andythenorth> nah
21:40:46  <andythenorth> not needed
21:41:28  *** kais58 has joined #openttd
21:41:59  <andythenorth> pathfinding nightmare, they’d always be trying to avoid each other on :P
21:55:09  * Wolf01 hands andythenorth a cookie
21:55:42  <andythenorth> is a commit? o_O
21:55:57  <Wolf01> No, german cookies from lidl
21:56:02  <Wolf01> They are good
21:56:03  <Wolf01> :P
21:56:26  <peter1139> lebkurchen eh
21:56:48  <Wolf01> Captain Rondo
21:58:32  <Wolf01> The vanilla ones are pure drugs, I ate 8 before punching myself and hide the packet
21:59:01  <__ln__> i don't recall such brand
21:59:22  <Wolf01> There's a pirate girl on the packet
22:00:01  <__ln__> gotta look next time i shop at lidl
22:00:13  * andythenorth must bed
22:00:15  <andythenorth> bye
22:00:16  *** andythenorth has left #openttd
22:01:25  <Wolf01>
22:01:54  *** gelignite has quit IRC
22:02:20  <__ln__> probably too tasty to import to finland
22:07:08  <Wolf01> They'll keep you at diet?
22:07:17  <_dp_> can I replace one base sprite with other base sprite in newgrf?)
22:07:31  <_dp_> like put snow instead of grass
22:07:39  <V453000> _dp_: yes
22:07:53  <V453000>
22:07:59  <V453000> replaces base tiles
22:08:04  <__ln__> can't even buy lipton ice tea or nestea pratically anywhere here :/
22:09:39  <Wolf01> :(
22:10:07  <Wolf01> I'll bring you some crates if I'll come here
22:10:10  <_dp_> V453000, yeah, but you're replacing them with custom ones
22:10:25  <__ln__> Wolf01: thanks in advance
22:10:38  <_dp_> V453000, and I don't want to make custom spritesheet, just use another sprite from the game
22:11:19  <V453000> hm
22:11:27  <V453000> not sure how would one go about that
22:11:41  <V453000> but why would you utterly break the rails to show as landscape_
22:14:08  <_dp_> break rails? dunno, for now I'm just trying to replace grass)
22:14:25  <_dp_> like toyland temperate replacement does, but it uses custom sprites
22:17:41  <_dp_> V453000, btw, about railtypes, can I override NUTS engines from other grf and replace allowed railtypes to disable them on normal rails?
22:20:27  <Eddi|zuHause> _dp_: maybe look at how alpinew.grf replaces the arctic grass with temperate grass?
22:20:50  <Eddi|zuHause> _dp_: it may be more involved than you think to find all the instances, though...
22:22:10  <Eddi|zuHause> _dp_: and yes, you can change the properties of vehicles from other grfs, if you set the flag that your grf is an addon to that other grf
22:22:37  <Eddi|zuHause>
22:23:09  <Eddi|zuHause> note that you can't override callbacks and stuff, you'd need to reimplement the whole graphics block
22:23:24  <_dp_> Eddi|zuHause, looks like alpinew does the same thing, at least it contains a huge spritesheet
22:23:53  <_dp_> Eddi|zuHause, cool, I'll try replacing them, ty
22:24:33  <V453000> I think all of nuts trains are defining important things by callbacks
22:24:34  <V453000> and stuff
22:24:46  <Eddi|zuHause> _dp_: the sprites are mostly snowy roofs and stuff
22:25:04  <V453000> I dont understand your problem _dp_ to be honest
22:25:26  <V453000> you have broken terrain/rails and instead of overriding the rails with railtypes, you are trying to fuck up the rest
22:25:54  <Eddi|zuHause> ah. i suppose it actually does copy the original sprites
22:26:09  <Eddi|zuHause> and not reuse the base sprites
22:26:36  <Eddi|zuHause> there might actually be a way, but probably it'd need to be a bit more hacky
22:27:11  <Lejving> V453000, I can't msg you
22:27:13  <Eddi|zuHause> _dp_: well, i guess at this point you might just need to make it properly, making a railtype and using the underlay
22:27:17  <Lejving> +g
22:27:25  <V453000> oh
22:27:26  <V453000> wtf
22:27:33  <V453000> how do I do -g then "D
22:27:34  <V453000> :D
22:27:38  <Lejving> :D
22:27:41  <Wolf01> :D
22:27:48  <V453000> or join channel #V453000
22:27:52  <Eddi|zuHause> /mode nick -g?
22:28:17  <_dp_> V453000, I'm just trying various ideas, not specifically solving that bg problem
22:28:28  <V453000> xd
22:29:22  <_dp_> V453000, for example, I like some ideas in NUTS and graphics, but there is too much redundant stuff imo, would be nice to simplify it
22:29:41  *** Wormnest has quit IRC
22:30:32  <V453000> I agree, I plan another train set
22:30:42  <V453000> if you make a fork, I won't hate it probably :)
22:33:12  <_dp_> I'd like to find some better ways of customizing grf than just forking them left and right)
22:34:30  <_dp_> besides, I can't even clone nuts repo, is it ridiculously large?
22:39:04  <_dp_> rofl, run out of disk space cloning it
22:39:12  <V453000> XD
22:40:53  <Wolf01> "And just to be sure he can be the only one to edit it, he set up a raid 5 with 4TB hard disks"
23:00:37  *** JezK_ has joined #openttd
23:03:50  *** CompuDesktop is now known as Compu
23:04:11  *** Compu has joined #openttd
23:09:06  *** BluesInTheNet has quit IRC
23:17:24  *** HerzogDeXtEr has joined #openttd
23:17:35  <_dp_> what happens when two newgrfs define same rail type?
23:18:26  <_dp_> with different compatible railtypes
23:21:01  <lorran78> i am testing if industries are created on objects but 10 years passed and no new lol
23:21:07  <lorran78> even with normal tile
23:21:29  <lorran78> what are the conditions to make creation of new indust?
23:22:09  <lorran78> oh sorry new indust :p
23:22:39  <_dp_> lorran78, you mean for them to spawn naturally?
23:24:02  <_dp_> lorran78, it tries to maintain certain industry density, so there wouldn't be much spawns unless some idustries start to close
23:24:16  *** HerzogDeXtEr1 has quit IRC
23:24:49  <_dp_> lorran78, you can try to create map with low density and increase it in game, that should encourage it to spawn more I think
23:26:54  *** Progman has quit IRC
23:27:34  * _dp_ finally made a grf that actually does smth
23:28:20  <_dp_> it even kind of disabling rail by setting its price to 660k/piece)
23:35:58  <lorran78> yes i made map with no indust just one city
23:36:07  <lorran78> just for testing this
23:39:52  <lorran78> it seems industr can't pop on objects like beach (newgrf)
23:39:55  <lorran78> but
23:40:21  <lorran78> when i create a map it's impossible to make large selection to make beach
23:40:22  <lorran78> :/
23:40:34  <lorran78> i must do tile by tile
23:41:11  <lorran78> :(
23:41:21  <lorran78> nope can pop on beach :(
23:54:48  <lorran78> but it seems indust can't pop on non-plane surface :)

Powered by YARRSTE version: svn-trunk