Times are UTC Toggle Colours
00:37:37 *** frosch123 has quit IRC 01:11:06 *** FLHerne has quit IRC 08:29:21 *** Supercheese has left #openttd.dev 08:36:53 *** Alberth has joined #openttd.dev 08:36:53 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v Alberth 09:04:30 *** andythenorth has joined #openttd.dev 09:04:30 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v andythenorth 09:55:23 *** ntoskrnl has joined #openttd.dev 10:15:29 *** frosch123 has joined #openttd.dev 10:15:29 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v frosch123 10:54:55 *** andythenorth has quit IRC 11:09:27 *** fonsinchen has joined #openttd.dev 11:09:27 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v fonsinchen 12:07:15 *** andythenorth has joined #openttd.dev 12:07:15 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v andythenorth 14:15:23 *** fonsinchen has quit IRC 14:40:32 *** fonsinchen has joined #openttd.dev 14:40:32 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v fonsinchen 16:42:45 *** Zuu__ has joined #openttd.dev 16:57:43 *** Zuu___ has joined #openttd.dev 17:02:36 *** Zuu___ has quit IRC 17:04:09 *** Zuu__ has quit IRC 17:05:58 *** fonsinchen has quit IRC 17:38:30 <frosch123> http://paste.openttdcoop.org/show/2079/ <- fs#5452 17:39:20 <frosch123> remove some optimisation magic and replacing it with something robust to side-effects 17:55:50 <Alberth> I had a look too, but I couldn't really fix it :) 17:56:12 <Alberth> the idea seems sound to me 17:57:22 *** andythenorth has quit IRC 18:07:29 *** Zuu has joined #openttd.dev 18:07:29 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v Zuu 18:08:12 <frosch123> hmm, something about mixing order pointers and order indices is really stupid 18:08:24 <frosch123> but the remaining use cases of DeleteOrder look fine 18:08:30 <frosch123> and i have no better idea :) 18:10:01 *** DorpsGek changes topic to "OpenTTD Dev Channel || Latest SVN: r24944 || Logs: http://webster.openttdcoop.org/?channel=openttd.dev || Voice (talk-right) upon request via #openttd; make sure you are registered to NickServ before asking" 18:10:26 <Alberth> perhaps it's just the unclarity which one is leading? 18:11:12 <Alberth> ie if you'd delete order->next and order->prev, it would be clear that the integer is used to jump between orders 18:11:37 <Alberth> (but that will probably fail because the integer eventually also uses those pointers :) ) 18:13:09 <frosch123> well, clearly the integer is leading, but using an integer index to access a linked list is not exactly nice :) 18:15:20 <Alberth> you'd have to make smallvectors of order lists then 18:15:29 <Alberth> S/of/for/ 18:25:23 *** ntoskrnl has quit IRC 18:44:15 *** DorpsGek changes topic to "OpenTTD Dev Channel || Latest SVN: r24945 || Logs: http://webster.openttdcoop.org/?channel=openttd.dev || Voice (talk-right) upon request via #openttd; make sure you are registered to NickServ before asking" 18:59:20 *** andythenorth has joined #openttd.dev 18:59:20 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v andythenorth 19:01:53 *** fonsinchen has joined #openttd.dev 19:01:53 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v fonsinchen 19:57:24 *** Supercheese has joined #openttd.dev 21:12:47 *** Alberth has left #openttd.dev 21:19:27 *** fonsinchen has quit IRC 21:55:48 *** frosch123 has quit IRC 22:06:42 *** andythenorth has quit IRC 22:11:55 *** FLHerne has joined #openttd.dev 23:40:29 *** FLHerne has quit IRC 23:44:54 *** Zuu has quit IRC