Config
Log for #openttd on 29th February 2024:
Times are UTC Toggle Colours
00:19:46  *** HerzogDeXtEr has quit IRC
01:02:09  <DorpsGek> [OpenTTD/OpenTTD] AnthonyGithubCorner commented on pull request #12164: Add: Highlight in white all pieces of company owned infrastructure in the viewport https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD/pull/12164#issuecomment-1970190769
02:17:57  *** Wormnest has quit IRC
03:49:29  *** D-HUND has joined #openttd
03:53:03  *** debdog has quit IRC
03:55:24  *** gnu_jj has joined #openttd
03:58:33  *** gnu_jj_ has quit IRC
04:28:31  *** Eddi|zuHause has quit IRC
04:56:17  *** Eddi|zuHause has joined #openttd
04:56:18  *** Flygon has quit IRC
04:57:39  *** keikoz has joined #openttd
05:35:51  *** Leopold___ has joined #openttd
05:42:01  *** Leopold__ has quit IRC
06:32:41  *** keikoz has quit IRC
07:54:02  <kuhnovic> I don't know how you do it xarick but you've found another edge case again. Nice work. I'll try to look into it soon.
08:11:39  <truebrain> funny, ever since I bitched about vscode using unreasonable long DNS names, it got fixed. I suspect there are spies in this channel ๐Ÿ˜›
08:16:15  <reldred> ahhahaahah
08:31:32  <DorpsGek> [OpenTTD/OpenTTD] merni-ns commented on discussion #11132: Add confirmation when sending vehicle group to depot https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD/discussions/11132
08:40:43  <merni> It would also be a lot easier if openttd's dropdowns stayed open without holding the click down, like most every UI in the last 20 years :p
08:41:16  <reldred> Yeah I gotta say I wouldn't mind that
08:41:36  <merni> It's especially a pain on a laptop
08:41:54  <reldred> I mean, I'm used to it after so many decades, but the behavior makes it hard to play on touch pads, touch screens, etc.
08:42:00  <merni> though the "double click to drag" option of windows somewhat lessens the pain on trackpads
08:50:47  <emperorjake> There was a PR for that
08:57:37  <peter1138> merni: Except for the toolbar menus, they do.
08:58:41  <_zephyris> Time to synchronise!
09:02:40  <merni> peter1138: Oh yeah
09:04:04  <andythenorth> also it would be easier to screenshot the railtypes selection window ๐Ÿ˜›
09:04:08  <andythenorth> window / very long menu /s
09:04:44  <truebrain> peter1138: let me guess, you have a patch for that? ๐Ÿ˜„
09:04:44  <merni> I think you mean s/window/very long menu :P
09:05:02  <andythenorth> irc sed was always /s
09:05:02  <merni> Someone should steal all the patches from peter's computer and make them into PRs
09:06:10  <merni> andythenorth: TIL there existed such a thing as IRC sed :p
09:06:28  <merni> I was thinking of the 'real' sed
09:09:32  <LordAro> andythenorth: i don't think it was
09:10:10  <andythenorth> mine was ๐Ÿ˜›
09:10:10  <andythenorth> solipsism
09:10:49  <LordAro> in modern times '/s' on the end of the message is usually used to explicitly mark out sarcasm
09:11:01  <peter1138> truebrain: I did, but I closed it because someone else did one too. That's still open.
09:12:15  <LordAro> https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD/pull/11338 https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD/pull/10938 no you didn't :p
09:12:41  <truebrain> ugh, sometimes Python, or libraries wrapping around databases, are just annoying. I was wondering why loading 20k entries took 1.5s .. it is purely in Python the creation of the objects that consumes all the time. Ugh.
09:15:54  <peter1138> You and your very large datasets...
09:16:05  <truebrain> 20k, large? Please
09:16:21  <peter1138> I don't use /s to explicitly mark out sarcasm.
09:17:00  <truebrain> I wish Python would hurry with a JIT ๐Ÿ™‚
09:18:43  <merni> Maybe use a faster language?
09:19:39  <truebrain> or a less crappy library
09:19:39  <truebrain> or offload it to a binary libraryt
09:19:39  <truebrain> SO MANY CHOICES
09:19:50  <truebrain> but in the end .... I did not expect 20k entries to take 1.5s to load ๐Ÿ™‚
09:20:37  <LordAro> at work we have an xpath-based xml parsing thing (just xml but with elements referring to other elements in various other ways), written in C. It's *stupidly* slow because it just reparses the xpaths repeatedly
09:20:52  <LordAro> so "a faster language" isn't all that good if the fundamental design is shit
09:21:05  <truebrain> I was like: let's try PyPy, maybe that fixes things
09:21:06  <truebrain> no
09:21:13  <truebrain> the ramp-up takes longer than the benefit ๐Ÿ˜›
09:21:23  <LordAro> truebrain: careful, you'll upset andythenorth
09:21:37  <truebrain> poor andy
09:22:18  <truebrain> lolz @ PyPy .. not sure what it is doing, but not what I would like. 1 run: 1.9s. 10 runs: 32s
09:22:21  <truebrain> that is not adding up ๐Ÿ˜„
09:23:05  <DorpsGek> [OpenTTD/OpenTTD] PeterN commented on pull request #12192: Codefix: Remove no-longer used ship special-case. https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD/pull/12192#issuecomment-1970731201
09:25:05  <truebrain> lolz, okay, the slow stuff went from 1.5s to 0.2s, but other stuff all of a sudden came looking around the corner, and takes longer ๐Ÿ˜„
09:25:16  <truebrain> briliant, just briliant .. I will be sitting here in the corner being annoyed by this all now
09:25:34  <peter1138> You'll have rewritten it soon.
09:25:41  <peter1138> TruePyPy
09:25:53  <truebrain> lolz; no.
09:25:59  <merni> PyPyPy
10:01:47  <xarick> hi
10:02:54  <xarick> testing NPF on 12193
10:03:35  <xarick> it finds a path towards the east dock, but the path is really dumb
10:04:38  <xarick> first, it goes northwest, hits the lumber mill, then turns around, goes southeast and then happens to get on track to reach the dock on the east
10:04:53  <xarick> it's buggy
10:05:28  <peter1138> Do you want to fix it?
10:05:42  <xarick> maybe, I will try
10:12:54  <kuhnovic> Please don't waste your time on NPF...
10:26:29  <merni> ^
10:26:39  <merni> is there any actual advantage that NPF still has?
10:32:10  <andythenorth> pypy is always faster except where it isn't
10:32:34  <andythenorth> and it's behind python main, which has also been getting faster
10:33:21  <truebrain> merni: nostalgic ๐Ÿ˜›
10:34:30  <merni> Other than that?
10:37:39  <andythenorth> savegame compatibility?
10:37:56  <andythenorth> also what else would we periodically propose deleting?
10:38:16  <kuhnovic> Flat docks support?
10:38:18  <truebrain> merni: with 14.0 we will get some insights how people use the game, and we can make calls like that based on it ๐Ÿ™‚
10:38:25  <LordAro> block signals
10:44:27  <xarick> `fstd->dest_coords = CalcClosestStationTile(fstd->station_index, v->tile, fstd->station_type);` same syndrome
10:44:50  <kuhnovic> What to do when your train is delayed and you have nothing to do? Exactly, nothing more fitting than developing openttd at a train station
10:45:07  <truebrain> train being delayed? Pff, how unusual! ๐Ÿ˜›
10:45:34  <kuhnovic> Neeeeever happens
10:48:04  *** Xaroth9232 has quit IRC
10:48:17  *** Xaroth9232 has joined #openttd
10:55:46  *** keikoz has joined #openttd
10:56:01  <belajalilija> LordAro: and that *other* type of signals
11:05:11  <peter1138> Programmable signals?
11:07:02  <kuhnovic> Is that something YAPF can't do?
11:07:10  <xarick> dang it
11:07:13  <peter1138> It's something OpenTTD can't do ;D
11:07:23  <belajalilija> peter1138: not quite
11:07:39  <belajalilija> those that shall not be named
11:07:40  <xarick> NPF is coded in a more general sense, for all transport types ๐Ÿ˜ฆ
11:07:52  <kuhnovic> I have to admit, if you look at the rail PF part of YAPF, then it's hard to see what it can and can't do. Holy shit ๐Ÿ˜†
11:08:17  <kuhnovic> xarick: When ship signals
11:12:47  <xarick> for npf, seems that for every neighbour tile, CalcClosestStationTile is issued, the H cost is 0
11:12:54  <xarick> it's a moving target!
11:13:04  <xarick> CalcClosestStationTile is... not fixed
11:14:08  <xarick> NPFCalcStationOrTileHeuristic what is the equivalent of this on yapf_ship?
11:14:31  <xarick> is it the EstimateCost?
11:16:59  <LordAro> belajalilija: nono, we need those for logic gates
11:17:25  <belajalilija> :angery:: :angery::angery:
11:17:42  <belajalilija> my plan is foiled
11:19:53  <LordAro> (https://wiki.openttdcoop.org/Logic in case you haven't seen it)
11:21:56  <belajalilija> oh no i know about logic gates
11:21:56  <belajalilija> i guess you're not in the discord or else you'd get why im saying it hahaha
11:26:57  <xarick> <https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD/blob/c4f94795071754a0aaf54549cf22f0f9f285c774/src/pathfinder/npf/npf.cpp#L164-L170> Line 164 `to` has the `CalcClosestStationTile` of the origin position, line 170 sets that `to` to a new location. it then calculates what seems to be the estimate cost from the current neighbour tile to `to`. Help! I'm confused!
11:27:32  <xarick> it does this for every transport type
11:27:32  <xarick> not just ships
11:28:52  <xarick> the estimate cost, in this extreme example, is 0
11:29:07  <xarick> always 0, until the ship moves out of the huge docking tile area
11:30:28  <peter1138> Okay but nobody cares about NPF ๐Ÿ™‚
11:30:39  <xarick> if (dist < ftd->best_bird_dist) {
11:30:57  <xarick> well, the best_bird_dist was already set to 0 on the previous neighbour
11:31:03  <xarick> so 0 < 0 is false
11:35:54  <ahyangyi> Perhaps our compilers already secretly compile away half of the NPF code?
11:36:05  <ahyangyi> if they are all like, if (0 < 0)
11:37:10  <xarick> the decision on whether a path is found or not found is done via: `path_found = (ftd.best_bird_dist == 0);`
11:37:53  <xarick> well in this case, it didn't find a path and yet the best_bird_dist is 0
11:37:53  <xarick> lel
11:40:43  <xarick> oh right, this calls the pf every tile
11:43:09  <xarick> how do  I draw the path?
11:43:28  <xarick> need to visualize what it has
11:50:04  <xarick> AYSTAR_NO_PATH
12:00:31  <xarick> 10000 nodes was not enough, let's try unlimited
12:01:31  <peter1138> Have you heard of buoys?
12:02:54  <xarick> map is 64x64, why would it need buoys
12:03:31  <peter1138> map is 64x64, why would 10,000 nodes not be enough?
12:04:46  <kuhnovic> If NPF uses trackdir+tile as the node hash, which it probably does, then a 64x64 map of pure water tiles already has 49152 potential nodes
12:05:17  <xarick> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1008473233844097104/1212732306616225792/image.png?ex=65f2e7f9&is=65e072f9&hm=1b0f8a1c522eb043a0dd084acfa5bf0d4f1b87c0fea4fd2feaad18ddba24a658&
12:05:17  <xarick> holy crap, it required 17130
12:05:25  <xarick> to find a path
12:05:29  <merni> Why exactly are you using NPF?
12:05:31  <peter1138> Heh
12:05:47  <kuhnovic> low level YAPF uses trackdir+exitdir which is already better, that's only 16384 on a 64x64 map
12:07:15  <xarick> okay, it found the west dock directly, but required 17130 max nodes :p
12:07:42  <kuhnovic> Now you see why a high level pathfinder was necessary ๐Ÿ˜›
12:08:09  <xarick> no nono, this is due to the huge docking area
12:08:18  <xarick> it's messing up the estimates
12:09:03  <xarick> it's 0 for every tile it advances
12:10:12  <xarick> i really wanted to see
12:10:14  <xarick> the path
12:10:18  <xarick> draw it
12:10:42  <xarick> but npf is different, it always using free(current)
12:10:58  <xarick> need to catch the path right when it fails
12:11:06  <xarick> before the free
12:11:45  <peter1138> Compare how it behaves with only a single docking tile.
12:12:11  <peter1138> Maybe it's really confused by always being in the docking area...
12:13:04  <kuhnovic> I keep saying it... why waste your time on NPF
12:13:39  <peter1138> He's going to waste his time anyway ๐Ÿ™‚
12:14:18  <kuhnovic> Better to waste it on YAPF, we might get something out of it ๐Ÿ˜›
12:14:37  <peter1138> True.
12:35:02  <peter1138> Is it lunch?
12:35:42  <andythenorth> Soon
12:35:42  <andythenorth> Pub
12:36:07  <peter1138> Ah, liquid lunch.
12:44:38  <orudge> Have sent an e-mail to Microsoft to see if we can get onto the Azure Code Signing preview, which sounds like it would be a decent solution for us (though no indication of pricing yet). It seems ImageMagick is now using it.
12:44:58  <orudge> Failing that I guess I will need to fairly soon start properly investigating the Azure cloud certificate storage thing, that seems to be the best option, but not especially cheap :(
12:51:29  <peter1138> Ah the old signing extortion racket.
13:16:26  *** Ox7C5 has quit IRC
13:19:18  <orudge> Yes, a bargain now at ยฃ299/year :|
13:19:54  *** Flygon has joined #openttd
13:27:02  <xarick> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1008473233844097104/1212752893229142076/2024-02-29_13-24-18.mp4?ex=65f2fb25&is=65e08625&hm=9ab0ec2b0ddb86aa651a661b62ab8d74b254141f0ff52d41b716cdd361ba1330&
13:27:02  <xarick> aha, got NPF drawing the path
13:28:37  <kuhnovic> Haha wow, I see why people prefere YAPF
13:29:43  <xarick> the leash is too short
13:31:49  <xarick> on the way back, it found the path without problems
13:32:12  <xarick> when going from dock to depot
13:32:13  <xarick> estimate works correctly in that case
13:37:07  <peter1138> Yeah so it just doesn't handle being inside the huge docking rea.
13:43:14  <xarick> oops i think i found a bug with AyStar, remember that fix about rivers stalling?
13:43:49  <xarick> changing the max nodes from the console now doesn't work ๐Ÿ˜ฆ
13:44:01  <xarick> my fault
13:49:29  <xarick> or maybe it didn't work previously? dang, need to recheck
14:03:24  <xarick> where are heightmaps saved?
14:03:29  <xarick> heightmap screenshots?
14:04:20  <xarick> oh, it's in the screenshot folder... that's where I didn't expect it
14:07:28  <kuhnovic> I have an odd question. Can somebody help me provide a savegame (preferable not a 4K 15 AI players one) that causes PruneIntermediateNodeBranch in yapf_costrail.hpp to be called? It seems the kind of function that gets called onlywhen Mars, Saturn and Jupiter all align...
14:13:09  <xarick> try AAAHogEx, or RailwAI
14:13:17  <xarick> they're both hella good with trains
14:14:48  <xarick> i think those may trigger when the rail route is changed, under construction and some rail got placed meanwhile ruining the current path cache?
14:14:56  <xarick> not sure
14:15:22  <xarick> or when the signals change? block signals? path signals?
14:15:34  <xarick> a mix of both? i dunno
14:15:35  <xarick> you can also try ChooChoo
14:16:56  <xarick> confirmed, it didn't work previously...
14:17:29  <xarick> xarick: a
14:27:05  *** Ox7C5 has joined #openttd
14:28:27  *** jinks has joined #openttd
14:28:56  <DorpsGek> [OpenTTD/OpenTTD] SamuXarick opened pull request #12194: Fix: Changing NPF max search nodes while in-game had no effect https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD/pull/12194
14:31:27  *** gelignite has joined #openttd
14:36:09  *** georgevb has joined #openttd
14:36:09  <georgevb> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1008473233844097104/1212770283572695110/image.png?ex=65f30b57&is=65e09657&hm=4b4bb2d213d0272f9a477e72333ac7d0d3b2c201157f7dc34b0ac4190f581a26&
14:36:09  <georgevb> Heed help with name callback.
14:36:09  <georgevb> I try to use it a display feature (because I can't find any way to check calculations)
14:36:09  <georgevb> LNG:
14:36:09  <georgevb> STR_MODEL_NUMBER6             :{UNSIGNED_WORD}-{UNSIGNED_WORD}-{UNSIGNED_WORD}-{UNSIGNED_WORD}-{UNSIGNED_WORD}-{UNSIGNED_WORD}
14:36:11  <georgevb> switch (FEAT_TRAINS, PARENT, subway_81_765_name_can_attach_wagon_max,
14:36:11  <georgevb> [ STORE_TEMP(2, 0x100), STORE_TEMP(3, 0x101), STORE_TEMP(4, 0x102),   0])
14:36:13  <georgevb> { return string(STR_MODEL_NUMBER6); }
14:36:13  <georgevb> gives:
14:36:31  <georgevb> but if I try to get some calculated values
14:37:39  <georgevb> switch (FEAT_TRAINS, PARENT, subway_81_765_name_can_attach_wagon_max,
14:37:39  <georgevb> [ STORE_TEMP(num_vehs_in_consist, 0x100), STORE_TEMP(LOAD_TEMP(5), 0x101), STORE_TEMP(4, 0x102), 0])
14:37:39  <georgevb> { return string(STR_MODEL_NUMBER6); }
14:38:07  <georgevb> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1008473233844097104/1212770782158266388/image.png?ex=65f30bce&is=65e096ce&hm=330119c8cf147420010ac375b5c4caa59525bfa9ad8fa554a7aeedeaf06bc08c&
14:38:38  <georgevb> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1008473233844097104/1212770910587850778/image.png?ex=65f30bed&is=65e096ed&hm=b95d447dc6f2b421a24ffe1c7382dff31f515c1375f38c7694cbab5406292b4c&
14:39:34  <georgevb> And it does not change (while it should, as I expect, return  num_vehs_in_consist)
14:39:34  <georgevb> What am I doing wrong?
14:40:24  <georgevb> How can I check my calculations results?
14:43:21  <DorpsGek> [OpenTTD/OpenTTD] SamuXarick updated pull request #12194: Fix: Changing NPF max search nodes while in-game had no effect https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD/pull/12194
14:49:18  <xarick> 17130 nodes doesn't exactly make the ship reach destination
14:49:25  <xarick> it's complicated!
14:50:27  <xarick> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1008473233844097104/1212773886605795359/2024-02-29_14-47-20.mp4?ex=65f30eb2&is=65e099b2&hm=ea83709f8d2929c8b2840893a5b053d47e90522210093308a522c74624b19941&
14:50:50  <xarick> in one of the calls, 17130 is sufficient to find the destination
14:51:15  <xarick> but when on the next tile 17130 is not, and ship goes some other way, what a mess
14:53:01  <kuhnovic> Judging from your previous video, the PF is clearly confused and doesn't get its estimates right. This means it will steer the search fringe all over the place. You might find your goal with 17130 nodes, you might now. Without a proper estimate the number of nodes is going to grow very quickly.
14:53:05  <xarick> why it didn't stick with it
14:55:03  <kuhnovic> https://www.redblobgames.com/pathfinding/a-star/introduction.html This page has some really good explanations of the differences between A*, Dijkstra and BFS. And the interactive animations are extremely nice.
14:56:02  <kuhnovic> And if you consider the fact that A* with a heuristic (estimate) of 0 is the same as Dijkstra, you see why you need so many nodes.
14:56:50  <kuhnovic> Knowing you you're not going to look at it, but I thought I should mention it ๐Ÿ˜›
15:13:33  <peter1138> `TILE_AREA_LOOP`
15:13:37  <peter1138> I think this might be quite old.
15:24:59  <xarick> there is no example in that page for ship depots... ๐Ÿ™‚
15:26:03  <xarick> or is it Dijkstraโ€™s Algorithm?
15:27:56  <xarick> looks like my implementation of search ship depot is ~Dijkstra's
15:28:06  <andythenorth> peter1138: only Coke
15:30:14  <xarick> I had no idea
15:32:46  <xarick> n.m_estimate = n.m_cost;
15:32:48  <xarick> yep
15:34:45  <xarick> the things I do without realizing
15:35:35  <xarick> I just copy paste until it works!
15:36:58  <peter1138> Like a true stackoverflow coder.
15:38:11  <xarick> I just had a very lol idea!
15:38:41  <xarick> with the advent of "multiple destinations", I wonder...
15:39:02  <xarick> if I can feed all ship depots destinations to a single pathfinder call
15:39:39  <xarick> and let the shortest_estimate dictate the result
15:51:00  *** nielsm has joined #openttd
16:19:30  *** Wormnest has joined #openttd
16:29:22  <peter1138> The advent...
16:32:30  <LordAro> peter1138: definitely a brand new idea
16:32:37  <LordAro> /s
16:35:28  <peter1138> I've got a commit here... `Remove $Id$`
16:35:33  <peter1138> How old even is this? ๐Ÿ˜ฎ
16:35:47  <LordAro> old.
16:37:01  <LordAro> Older than Oct 2019
17:23:31  *** gelignite has quit IRC
17:25:52  *** Wolf01 has joined #openttd
17:26:44  *** HerzogDeXtEr has joined #openttd
17:31:16  <kuhnovic> xarick: Now you're on the right track. This page talk about your exact use case
17:31:16  <kuhnovic> https://www.redblobgames.com/pathfinding/early-exit/
18:04:42  <xarick> how broken will this be ๐Ÿ™‚
18:05:28  <xarick> I need a depot.best_length from the high lvl pathfinder... help!
18:06:30  <xarick> Very reluctant to pass it via DistanceManhattan
18:09:37  <xarick> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1008473233844097104/1212824006424797256/image.png?ex=65f33d60&is=65e0c860&hm=35f9d777f7663aa017180cd637d9f76373900c054562e43c19843a137c39181f&
18:09:48  <xarick> not gonna be expensive at all
18:10:34  <xarick> that's regions!
18:10:34  <xarick> 471 regions
18:32:52  *** D-HUND is now known as debdog
18:36:39  <DorpsGek> [OpenTTD/OpenTTD] eints-sync[bot] pushed 1 commits to master https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD/commit/c0b5510a94206033ae1bb6437248ca59d6fb6f9d
18:36:40  <DorpsGek>   - Update: Translations from eints (by translators)
18:39:23  *** Ox7C5 has quit IRC
18:41:13  *** SigHunter has quit IRC
18:44:05  *** SigHunter has joined #openttd
18:51:35  <xarick> `} else if (max_returned_path_length == MAX_NUMBER_OF_NODES) { // shortcut for Nearest Depot Order`
18:52:02  <xarick> couldn't detect a nearest depot order otherwise
19:03:52  <xarick> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1008473233844097104/1212837634099912734/image.png?ex=65f34a11&is=65e0d511&hm=65eb398571ec0e5931b30df3d31420c84a3c7df75b9eedbbbb80fa2b87261ea2&
19:03:52  <xarick> not fast enough...
19:03:55  <xarick> my other method is faster
19:04:10  <xarick> at about ~80 ms
19:07:21  <DorpsGek> [OpenTTD/OpenTTD] agentw4b commented on discussion #10388: [GS] Further control over GS story page formatting https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD/discussions/10388
19:17:11  <DorpsGek> [OpenTTD/OpenTTD] rubidium42 commented on pull request #12194: Fix: Changing NPF max search nodes while in-game had no effect https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD/pull/12194#pullrequestreview-1909691926
19:17:24  <DorpsGek> [OpenTTD/OpenTTD] agentw4b commented on discussion #10388: [GS] Further control over GS story page formatting https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD/discussions/10388
19:25:28  <andythenorth> Well
19:25:28  <andythenorth> Flat Horses?
19:36:12  <peter1138> Well.
19:36:36  <peter1138> Deduplicating code that is almost but not quite the same. ๐Ÿ˜ฎ
19:39:45  <xarick> need to time this the proper way
19:39:47  <xarick> TicToc!
19:54:41  <xarick> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1008473233844097104/1212850447698628669/image.png?ex=65f35600&is=65e0e100&hm=6e784ba427803c1d4eaad155ea54053e174fd0c5bd936080714bdb7a2d370f70&
19:54:41  <xarick> is slow, confirmed
20:05:48  <DorpsGek> [OpenTTD/OpenTTD] SamuXarick updated pull request #10544: Fix #5713: Use pathfinder to find closest ship depot https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD/pull/10544
20:11:53  <georgevb> georgevb: Sorry for raising the question, but still, what am I doing wrong with name callback
20:12:57  <xarick> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1008473233844097104/1212855008907894875/image.png?ex=65f35a3f&is=65e0e53f&hm=28083cea79a5007d3bd8e8c0706064cbfa3d42390ae8ffc3087595648b358087&
20:12:57  <xarick> much faster
20:15:57  <andythenorth> georgevb: When is the name callback re-evaulated?
20:17:37  *** Flygon has quit IRC
20:19:07  <DorpsGek> [OpenTTD/OpenTTD] wooky commented on discussion #11132: Add confirmation when sending vehicle group to depot https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD/discussions/11132
20:19:18  <andythenorth> Is there any bit shifting needed?
20:20:18  <andythenorth> Does anything thrash register 0x100 in this context?
20:21:48  <andythenorth> Horse name callback template https://github.com/andythenorth/iron-horse/blob/main/src/templates/procedures_name.pynml
20:32:08  <xarick> let's see if I know how to use AutoRestoreBackup
20:37:58  <georgevb> andythenorth: I do on see why should it be needed. I need to see numbers, and when I specify them directly, they are displayed correctly. But when I change them to values to vars, it becomes brocken
20:39:01  <DorpsGek> [OpenTTD/OpenTTD] SamuXarick updated pull request #12194: Fix: Changing NPF max search nodes while in-game had no effect https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD/pull/12194
20:46:16  <xarick> what is faster than `std::find(m_destTiles.begin(), m_destTiles.end(), tile) != m_destTiles.end()`
20:46:40  <xarick> when m_destTiles size is about ~500?
20:46:44  <xarick> std::vector
20:47:29  <DorpsGek> [OpenTTD/OpenTTD] Cuddle-sheep opened issue #12195: [Crash]:  https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD/issues/12195
20:48:56  <Rubidium> https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/algorithm/binary_search *if* they are sorted by chance
20:51:12  <DorpsGek> [OpenTTD/OpenTTD] DefinitelyNotRau117 commented on discussion #11132: Add confirmation when sending vehicle group to depot https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD/discussions/11132
21:02:09  <xarick> I don't think they're sorted, let me see
21:33:57  *** virtualrandomnumber has joined #openttd
21:34:41  *** virtualrandomnumber has quit IRC
21:38:42  <xarick> they're not sorted
21:54:41  <peter1138> `SLEG_CONDSTRUCTLIST("speclist", SlRoadStopTileData,                          SLV_NEWGRF_ROAD_STOPS, SL_MAX_VERSION),`
21:54:47  <peter1138> Well, that confused me for a while.
21:54:56  <peter1138> "speclist" is entirely the wrong string there, but too late.
21:57:26  <truebrain> just a bit late, yes ๐Ÿ˜„
22:10:00  *** keikoz has quit IRC
22:13:27  *** nielsm has quit IRC
22:18:28  <xarick> should I give NPF the multi-destination treatment?
22:18:42  <xarick> or screw NPF, just remove it?
22:22:17  <xarick> https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD/compare/master...SamuXarick:OpenTTD:check-next-tile-is-a-docking-destination-
22:22:32  <xarick> check it out
22:22:51  <xarick> the multi destination feature
22:23:11  <xarick> for ship depots and docking tiles
22:23:27  <peter1138> `error: no viable conversion from returned value of type 'const SaveLoad[]' to function return type 'SaveLoadTable'`
22:23:27  <peter1138> Yeah, sure...
22:23:32  <xarick> kuhnovic
22:23:40  <xarick> I summon you
22:28:05  <xarick> oops, forgot to clean something
22:29:52  <xarick> done
22:33:43  <xarick> eh... forgot another thing ๐Ÿ™‚
22:37:07  <xarick> TicToc was not supposed to be there
22:38:15  <xarick> what is the same of the function that rounds up to the next integer from a division?
22:38:47  <xarick> I want a function that makes 50 / 2 = 3
22:39:04  <xarick> oh... bad example
22:39:50  <xarick> there, fixed
22:43:35  *** Leopold___ has quit IRC
22:44:55  *** Leopold_ has joined #openttd
22:50:39  <xarick> (x + y - 1) รท y says stackoverflow
22:51:54  *** Leopold_ has quit IRC
22:51:58  *** Leopold_ has joined #openttd
22:52:34  *** Wolf01 has quit IRC
22:53:41  <andythenorth> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1008473233844097104/1212895498470559844/image.png?ex=65f37ff5&is=65e10af5&hm=c0700295a7f266635a433f6dcde8b8d1b061d275869601b192f4fa285ae13ba9&
22:53:41  <andythenorth> I feel that mistakes were made
22:53:47  <andythenorth> "possibly by me"
22:54:20  <talltyler> Iโ€™m not sure who else could have made this mistake ๐Ÿ˜›
22:54:33  <peter1138> xarick: CeilDiv
22:55:22  <xarick> NICE, THX
22:56:39  <talltyler> I can try to make you a โ€œbuy random variantโ€ button sometime (probably Ctrl+Click on the buy button), although cloned trains would all look the same
22:58:47  <andythenorth> could be worth testing
22:59:24  <andythenorth> I wonder if there's a way to do it where clone also works
22:59:34  <andythenorth> "it's just a pointer"
23:00:03  <talltyler> Cloning could work with a new flag like the random reverse one, โ€œrandom variant when cloning/autoreplacingโ€
23:00:20  <andythenorth> or if there's some property set giving the range
23:00:31  <talltyler> โ€ฆwhich would also solve autoreplace ๐Ÿ˜‰
23:01:59  <talltyler> That seems duplicate given the vehicle already had a variant group, no?
23:01:59  <andythenorth> oh random from variant group, yes ok ๐Ÿ™‚
23:03:40  <talltyler> My flight is leaving, bye me
23:03:40  <talltyler> /has left IRC
23:06:01  *** tokai has joined #openttd
23:06:01  *** ChanServ sets mode: +v tokai
23:12:53  *** tokai|noir has quit IRC
23:15:19  <xarick> std::abs or abs?
23:15:38  <xarick> what shall I use
23:27:18  <DorpsGek> [OpenTTD/OpenTTD] DefinitelyNotRau117 opened issue #12196: [Bug]: In some case, extra resources are loaded from online-content https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD/issues/12196
23:56:12  <DorpsGek> [OpenTTD/OpenTTD] TrueBrain commented on issue #12196: [Bug]: In some case, extra resources are loaded from online-content https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD/issues/12196
23:57:46  <truebrain> Seems there is a bug, just not the one being reported ๐Ÿ˜› can't run OpenTTD on mobile, but sounds like "total download size" isn't actually total, but just the filtered content ๐Ÿ˜„

Powered by YARRSTE version: svn-trunk