Config
Log for #openttd on 21st February 2015:
Times are UTC Toggle Colours
00:00:12  *** Biolunar [Biolunar@blfd-4d026c49.pool.mediaWays.net] has joined #openttd
00:04:06  *** FLHerne [~flh@dsl-217-155-24-22.zen.co.uk] has quit [Quit: There's a real world out here!]
00:12:08  <samu> i'm looking into road_map.h, comparing to water_map.h to learn what I'm supposed to create
00:12:32  <samu> a function
00:18:53  <samu> I'm lost, it's a labyrinth
00:19:55  <samu> like a hierarchy of some sorts
00:20:50  <samu> how do i visualize this tree in visual studio?
00:22:46  <samu> eh, the program is not called "visual" studio for nothing
00:32:25  <samu> wow jesus, 90 degrees really hurt ships
00:35:09  *** Quatroking [~Quatrokin@ip226-139-211-87.adsl2.static.versatel.nl] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
00:41:48  <samu> looks like the problem is bigger than I had anticipated
00:42:33  <samu> building a ship depot on a river vs building a ship depot on a canal with no owner
00:43:33  <samu> it doesn't take the river as yours
00:43:49  <samu> hmm
00:54:15  *** oskari89 [oskari89@83-102-63-32.bb.dnainternet.fi] has quit []
01:01:30  <samu> i don't know how to do this
01:04:07  <samu> there's 2 road types
01:04:24  <samu> road and tram
01:04:41  <samu> but there's 4 water types
01:05:22  <samu> or sub-types
01:05:27  <samu> classes
01:06:24  <samu> iswater, iscanal, isriver, issea?
01:07:28  <samu> depot can be built in all of them
01:08:28  <samu> road and tram depots don't re-uses the road
01:10:16  <samu> then i read this m1 Bits 4..0: The owner of a tile can be either companies (human or AI) or "Game entities".
01:10:26  <samu> and i get lost, i dont understand
01:11:27  <samu> i need a very complex function apparently
01:11:40  <samu> ship depot got 2 water tiles
01:11:46  <Eddi|zuHause> samu: but opposing to roadtypes, different watertypes cannot be on the same tile
01:12:04  <samu> there's too many combinations of owners and class on those two tiles
01:12:12  <Eddi|zuHause> a tile can't be both canal and sea
01:12:59  <Eddi|zuHause> samu: but each tile has only ever two owners, water owner and depot owner. who cares whether the other tile is the same?
01:14:28  <samu> it can have a 3rd owner
01:14:55  <samu> a bridge over it
01:15:08  <samu> wait, no
01:15:09  <samu> sorry
01:15:18  <Eddi|zuHause> the bridge is not actually on the tile
01:15:48  <glx> only bridge ends have an owner
01:15:58  <Eddi|zuHause> the bridge stores its owner on the end tile
01:17:14  <Eddi|zuHause> the only thing the tile stores about a bridge is whether it has to search in \ or / direction for the end tile
01:22:03  *** namad7 [~aaaaa@pool-74-111-111-176.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net] has joined #openttd
01:22:53  *** namad7 [~aaaaa@pool-74-111-111-176.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net] has quit []
01:24:35  <samu> woah
01:25:02  <samu> in the advent that I need to store a 3rd owner, what can I do?
01:25:16  <samu> thinking of locks upper/lower parts
01:26:05  <Eddi|zuHause> those each have a different tile, why would you need to store them?
01:26:22  *** liq3 [~liq3@CPE-120-147-178-81.gdfw1.lon.bigpond.net.au] has joined #openttd
01:26:52  <samu> say, if i am to allow bridges over lock parts
01:28:45  <samu> hmmph
01:29:42  <Eddi|zuHause> totally unrelated
01:29:58  <samu> okay, back to the ship depot then
01:31:24  <samu> must think of what I need
01:32:24  <samu> two owners
01:32:57  <samu> i can't stay focused on this
01:33:11  <samu> i know what I need, but i don't know how to tackle this
01:34:18  <samu> different watertypes cannot be on the same tile
01:34:21  *** Pikka [~Octomom@203-206-161-219.perm.iinet.net.au] has joined #openttd
01:36:06  <samu> (yet)
01:37:49  <samu> canal could move from being a class into some other category
01:38:02  <samu> hmm
01:38:48  <samu> no
01:39:57  <samu> HasTileWaterClass(TileIndex t)
01:40:37  <samu> return IsTileType(t, MP_WATER) || IsTileType(t, MP_STATION) || IsTileType(t, MP_INDUSTRY) || IsTileType(t, MP_OBJECT);
01:42:52  <samu> assert(IsTileType(t, MP_ROAD) || IsTileType(t, MP_STATION) || IsTileType(t, MP_TUNNELBRIDGE));
01:43:06  <samu> these two are so similar and so different
01:44:34  <samu> return (RoadTypes)GB(_me[t].m7, 6, 2);
01:44:56  <samu> return (WaterClass)GB(_m[t].m1, 5, 2);
01:45:29  <ST2> somehow I'm with the feeling that Samu is not changing nothing at all, he only asks what todo
01:45:30  <glx> I think you need to learn more C/C++ :)
01:46:19  <samu> im not doing anything without knowing where to start
01:46:33  <samu> i'm trying to understand what I need first
01:46:38  <samu> then i start
01:47:55  *** Xrufuian [~xrufuian@cpe-142-136-204-41.socal.res.rr.com] has quit [Quit: Quit]
01:48:31  <samu> i have to create a function
01:48:40  <ST2> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=c%2B%2B+tutorials
01:49:17  <glx> well 2 functions, 1 to write and 1 to read
01:49:42  <glx> but there are very similar
01:49:44  <ST2> sorry glx, I had to say and post that link
01:50:19  <ST2> sometimes I have doubts too and if all googling work dnt do the job, I ask here
01:51:18  <ST2> but Samu is not even googling for leaning C++
01:51:28  <ST2> learning*
01:51:39  <ST2> it's hard that way
01:52:37  <ST2> again, sorry. but I had to say it
01:52:52  <ST2> Samu, get your priorities
02:00:19  <samu> okay i'm going to read this http://www.cplusplus.com/doc/tutorial/introduction/visualstudio/
02:41:06  *** samu [~oftc-webi@po1-84-90-251-240.netvisao.pt] has quit [Quit: Page closed]
03:12:36  *** supermop [~supermop@d110-33-170-165.sun801.vic.optusnet.com.au] has joined #openttd
03:35:39  <Pikka> Dr mop I presume?
03:36:59  *** Biolunar_ [Biolunar@blfd-4d0885f4.pool.mediaWays.net] has joined #openttd
03:43:57  *** Biolunar [Biolunar@blfd-4d026c49.pool.mediaWays.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
03:44:07  *** Xrufuian [~xrufuian@cpe-142-136-204-41.socal.res.rr.com] has joined #openttd
04:12:44  *** glx [~glx@000128ec.user.oftc.net] has quit [Quit: Bye]
04:36:32  *** flipFLOPS [~aardvark@cpe-107-185-75-97.socal.res.rr.com] has joined #openttd
04:54:53  *** zeknurn [~sup@hd9483b0c.seveveb.dyn.perspektivbredband.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
04:55:34  *** zeknurn [~sup@hd9483b0c.seveveb.dyn.perspektivbredband.net] has joined #openttd
05:04:13  *** HerzogDeXtEr1 [~flex@i59F6B4CC.versanet.de] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
05:56:02  *** Eddi|zuHause [~johekr@p57BD44E8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit []
05:56:17  *** Eddi|zuHause [~johekr@p5DC664D0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #openttd
06:07:50  *** Flygon__ [~Flygon@147.18.214.218.sta.commander.net.au] has joined #openttd
06:08:11  *** Flygon_ [~Flygon@147.18.214.218.sta.commander.net.au] has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
06:40:28  *** Xrufuian [~xrufuian@cpe-142-136-204-41.socal.res.rr.com] has quit [Quit: Quit]
07:12:10  *** Alberth [~alberth@2001:981:c6c5:1:be5f:f4ff:feac:e11] has joined #openttd
07:12:13  *** mode/#openttd [+o Alberth] by ChanServ
07:19:39  *** flipFLOPS [~aardvark@cpe-107-185-75-97.socal.res.rr.com] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
07:19:50  *** liq4 [liq3@CPE-120-147-178-81.gdfw1.lon.bigpond.net.au] has joined #openttd
07:19:50  *** liq3 is now known as Guest135
07:19:50  *** liq4 is now known as liq3
07:21:02  *** andythenorth [~Andy@cpc10-aztw26-2-0-cust867.18-1.cable.virginm.net] has joined #openttd
07:21:07  <andythenorth> o/
07:26:16  *** Guest135 [~liq3@CPE-120-147-178-81.gdfw1.lon.bigpond.net.au] has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
07:26:24  <Alberth> moin andy
07:27:31  *** flipFLOPS [~aardvark@cpe-107-185-75-97.socal.res.rr.com] has joined #openttd
07:27:32  *** flipFLOPS [~aardvark@cpe-107-185-75-97.socal.res.rr.com] has quit []
07:36:59  *** roidal [~roland@194-152-169-54.adsl.highway.telekom.at] has joined #openttd
08:05:06  <planetmaker> moin moin
08:15:50  <planetmaker> Alberth, bridges in OpenTTD can have a maximum length. So yes, "too long for a bridge" is an actual error in OpenTTD :)
08:16:04  <planetmaker> however, of course, the cheat your mention works around that
08:16:20  <Alberth> hi hi
08:17:27  <Alberth> I know bridges have a quite finite max length :p   I don't see building an island as a cheat, we do it too in RL with long bridges :p
08:17:49  <Supercheese> RL OP, needs nerf
08:18:47  *** Pensacola [~quassel@c80094.upc-c.chello.nl] has joined #openttd
08:19:21  <Alberth> hmm, maybe automatically build islands?  :p
08:21:52  <andythenorth> he really is just asking for boats no?
08:21:57  <andythenorth> he wants an alternative to buses
08:22:04  <andythenorth> he could also use planes
08:24:09  <Alberth> Supercheese: OP seems quite reasonable, it's more Sunshare hijaccking the thread :)
08:25:10  <Supercheese> He started the thread, though
08:26:31  <Alberth> oh, indeed he did. I was thinking about the "connect two islands" thread recently, but I was wrong
08:41:13  *** Yotson [~Yotson@2001:980:6ac8:1:15ae:edc5:edf4:41d2] has joined #openttd
09:25:55  *** Progman [~progman@p57A19494.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #openttd
09:26:57  *** chillcore [~chillcore@91.182.36.19] has joined #openttd
09:27:14  <chillcore> hello all
09:28:27  <chillcore> "int* const q = new int[10];"   Now the array elements in q can be modified, but any change to q (like q++) is illegal, as it is with an ordinary array identifier.
09:28:31  <chillcore> Yay?
09:30:13  *** Pikka [~Octomom@203-206-161-219.perm.iinet.net.au] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
09:36:34  <Rubidium> chillcore: it's not like that's a new feature ;)
09:38:33  <chillcore> true Rubidium ... I just kept getting confused as to why trying to modifie an array kept throwing me errors. :P
09:39:15  <chillcore> If I understand correctly simply removing the asterix or ataching it to const will make it fail again ...
09:39:19  <Rubidium> but you're not modifying the array, you're modifying something that points to something else
09:39:44  <chillcore> ok
09:40:41  <Rubidium> in the above case you have a pointer (that may not change) to an array (that may be changed)
09:41:14  <Rubidium> though I reckon it happens more often the other way around, i.e. a pointer that may change but the array (content) that may not be changed
09:41:57  <Rubidium> int q[] = new int[10] gives you the equivalent of int * const q = new int[10]
09:42:19  <chillcore> thanks for the clarification. I really should do them exercises too next time I go through my books. ;)
09:43:52  <Rubidium> and const int * q = new int[10] makes little sense because you may modify q (but then you loose track of your array) but you may not modify the thing q points to (i.e. the array content)
09:44:39  <Rubidium> though you'll often see const int * q = <some const array> where q is used to iterate over that array
09:45:22  <Rubidium> and for the fun of it, you can also get things like const int ** const which'll get your mind all garbled up ;)
09:46:28  <supermop> sunshare is our muse
09:47:09  <supermop> oops day at beach means i missed pikka
09:47:55  <andythenorth> hmm
09:48:20  <andythenorth> I have these hot metal cars using the animated fire cycle when loaded
09:48:23  <andythenorth> I could add smoke :P
09:48:48  <supermop> hot wheels?
09:48:59  <chillcore> Rubidium: the thing that gets me in most books is that arrays are in chapter 3 and what I quoted is in chapter 13 which I found after a detour through chapter 22.
09:49:08  <chillcore> anyhoo
10:05:05  *** Celestar [~Celestar@p5DE456CA.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #openttd
10:10:07  <supermop> http://www.tt-forums.net/download/file.php?id=183640
10:10:10  <supermop> !!!
10:21:02  *** Pikkaphone [~yaaic@203-206-161-219.perm.iinet.net.au] has joined #openttd
10:21:08  <supermop> these may have looked better as trains, but then i miss out on the pun
10:21:14  <supermop> yo Pikkaphone
10:21:17  <Pikkaphone> what what
10:21:37  <supermop> little coffee machines driving about!
10:22:00  <Pikkaphone> Choo Choo!
10:22:14  <Pikkaphone> are they acceptable then?
10:22:23  <supermop> very cute
10:22:44  <supermop> trying to get my head around applying liveries to the real trams
10:23:09  <supermop> rhino 4 has a 'decal' feature that i will try to use
10:23:31  <Pikkaphone> fun
10:23:48  <supermop> trams run all night tonight here
10:24:16  <supermop> ran down to st kilda but then got rained out this afternoon
10:24:34  *** oskari89 [oskari89@83-102-63-32.bb.dnainternet.fi] has joined #openttd
10:24:51  <supermop> anyway, the Z classes are 2m longer than the a class
10:25:00  <supermop> to chibi or not to chibi
10:25:52  <supermop> a is 14, w is 15, and z is 16
10:25:53  <Pikkaphone> imo the a classes you have now are too long for ttd ;)
10:25:58  <supermop> yeah
10:26:26  <supermop> so i can move away from 16m/tile and re-render, or squish the Zs
10:26:30  *** liq4 [liq3@CPE-120-147-178-81.gdfw1.lon.bigpond.net.au] has joined #openttd
10:26:30  *** liq3 is now known as Guest143
10:26:30  *** liq4 is now known as liq3
10:27:06  <supermop> melbourne really seemed to drag its heels on just building an articulated tram
10:27:10  <Pikkaphone> well if you're okay with how the a's look then might as well keep to your standard
10:27:34  *** Quatroking [~Quatrokin@ip226-139-211-87.adsl2.static.versatel.nl] has joined #openttd
10:27:35  <andythenorth> hello Pikkaphone
10:28:00  <supermop> making  the w and z also 14m may be a good solution as well
10:28:03  <Pikkaphone> hallo andythenorth
10:28:17  <supermop> just remove a window bau
10:28:19  <supermop> bay
10:28:20  <andythenorth> toooooooooorpedo https://dev.openttdcoop.org/attachments/download/7167/hot_metal_car_gen_3_0.png
10:28:43  <Pikkaphone> that's a spicy meatball
10:29:07  <andythenorth> I added some animated hot sauce
10:33:26  *** Guest143 [liq3@CPE-120-147-178-81.gdfw1.lon.bigpond.net.au] has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
10:36:33  * andythenorth bbl
10:36:35  *** andythenorth [~Andy@cpc10-aztw26-2-0-cust867.18-1.cable.virginm.net] has quit [Quit: andythenorth]
10:51:18  *** Progman [~progman@p57A19494.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Quit: Progman]
11:14:50  *** sla_ro|master [~sla.ro@95.76.27.245] has joined #openttd
11:16:37  *** Celestar [~Celestar@p5DE456CA.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
11:24:54  * chillcore invents "CC plus minus"
11:25:19  <chillcore> ev erything can and will change unless you exxplicitely specifie it can not ... hmm
11:25:28  <chillcore> :P
11:25:49  *** frosch123 [~frosch@frnk-4d00dc1d.pool.mediaWays.net] has joined #openttd
11:26:37  *** liq4 [liq3@CPE-120-147-178-81.gdfw1.lon.bigpond.net.au] has joined #openttd
11:26:38  *** liq3 is now known as Guest146
11:26:38  *** liq4 is now known as liq3
11:33:21  *** Guest146 [liq3@CPE-120-147-178-81.gdfw1.lon.bigpond.net.au] has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
11:38:52  *** Progman [~progman@p57A193B0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #openttd
11:46:21  <chillcore> lol book ... "SelfReferential* sr; // Head spinning yet?"
11:48:23  *** gelignite [~gelignite@i5387AD05.versanet.de] has joined #openttd
11:50:03  *** Pensacola [~quassel@c80094.upc-c.chello.nl] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
12:07:18  *** Progman [~progman@p57A193B0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
12:07:45  *** l4urenz [~l4urenz@D97B5AAC.cm-3-4b.dynamic.ziggo.nl] has joined #openttd
12:08:42  <Rubidium> chillcore: type* <name> is quite misleading
12:09:22  <Rubidium> you know about int x, y declaring two variables of type int? Now what types are x and y in: int* x, y
12:11:44  <chillcore> memory adresses?
12:13:13  <Rubidium> x is an int pointer, y is just an int
12:13:39  <chillcore> right I read that and forgot untill you mentioned it ...
12:14:22  <Rubidium> which is why openttd's coding style dictates that the * should be placed against the variable, i.e. int *x, y
12:15:42  <chillcore> right   ... I have some more reading to do soon-ish
12:16:20  <Alberth> it better expresses that * is part of x, rather than part of 'int'
12:16:35  <Alberth> very subtle, but it works
12:26:46  <chillcore> thank you for the hint ... browses coding style
12:27:58  <chillcore> if it were not for trying to fix already working code this would be more fun :P
12:29:02  <chillcore> I guess that is why I always skip those things ^^^
12:31:41  *** Supercheese is now known as Guest149
12:31:46  *** Supercheese [~Superchee@cpe-76-178-136-186.natnow.res.rr.com] has joined #openttd
12:36:47  *** Guest149 [~Superchee@cpe-76-178-136-186.natnow.res.rr.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
12:37:22  *** roidal_ [~roland@193-154-140-192.adsl.highway.telekom.at] has joined #openttd
12:42:01  *** roidal [~roland@194-152-169-54.adsl.highway.telekom.at] has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
13:00:09  *** OsteHove` [~OsteHovel@90.149.87.140] has joined #openttd
13:00:33  <Eddi|zuHause> Rubidium: is that the ancient title game?
13:06:27  <supermop> goodnight
13:09:36  <chillcore> goodnight
13:15:31  *** supermop [~supermop@d110-33-170-165.sun801.vic.optusnet.com.au] has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
13:17:38  *** OsteHove` is now known as OsteHovel
13:20:24  <CosmicRay> Hello folks.  Been playing OpenTTD for awhile here, and I seem to have a problem where after awhile, the game grows so that all of my transport networks are completely overwhelmed.  Regardless of whether I'm using cargodist.  I can have intercontinental airports, 7-track train stations, and them both completely busy and still thousands of people waiting at stations.  Even with streetcar grfs the in-city transport is overwhelmed too, usually w
13:20:25  <CosmicRay> ith getting people to/from stations.  ideas?
13:21:14  <Eddi|zuHause> house NewGRFs have a big influence on how many passengers are generated
13:22:15  <CosmicRay> the only NewGRF I typically use is Generic Tram Set v0.4
13:23:16  <CosmicRay> and on my most recent game I haven't even tended to mail or freight much, but that's always a problem too.  the mines and farms keep producing more and more, the factories keep producing more and more...
13:23:25  <CosmicRay> sort of a good but annoying problem
13:23:58  <Eddi|zuHause> then i think the only solution is building more efficient networks :)
13:24:47  <CosmicRay> I've had games with 8-track mainlines and massive train stations...  or every town having an intercontinental airport.
13:24:52  <CosmicRay> they always get overwhelmed in the end
13:25:41  <CosmicRay> I'm playing with pretty much default settings, too.  large maps (at least 256x256), mostly temperate zone
13:26:16  <CosmicRay> I don't think I'm really tweaking settings in any impactful way
13:26:50  <CosmicRay> I've tried the idea of transportation hubs with cargodist
13:27:00  <CosmicRay> they get quickly overwhelmed
13:27:17  <Eddi|zuHause> yes, that tends to happen
13:27:24  <Eddi|zuHause> try vehicle sets with higher capacity
13:27:28  <CosmicRay> hmm
13:27:36  <CosmicRay> any particular newgrf to recommend?
13:27:46  <Eddi|zuHause> not really
13:28:02  <CosmicRay> with the defaults my planes max out at 400 passengers and most of my maglev trains at 470 (because I run some mail cars on them too)
13:28:38  <CosmicRay> AFAIK I am using the highest-capacity planes and best trains
13:28:51  <CosmicRay> my game is up to year 2291 so there are plenty of nice vehicles ;-)
13:32:26  *** Pikkaphone [~yaaic@203-206-161-219.perm.iinet.net.au] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
13:36:33  * chillcore points the pointer to the door, therefore  the pointer is no more. or is it?
13:36:46  <chillcore> Expointius!
13:37:07  <chillcore> did not work. nvm me
13:40:09  <Terkhen> hello
13:40:31  <chillcore> ola
13:40:56  *** sla_ro|master [~sla.ro@95.76.27.245] has quit []
13:41:47  <Alberth> hi hi
13:54:55  *** gelignite [~gelignite@i5387AD05.versanet.de] has quit [Quit: http://bit.ly/1kso8Ta]
13:58:49  *** Celestar [~Celestar@ip-109-43-2-14.web.vodafone.de] has joined #openttd
14:01:33  *** samu [~oftc-webi@po1-84-90-251-240.netvisao.pt] has joined #openttd
14:08:13  <samu> hi
14:33:01  *** HerzogDeXtEr [~flex@i59F6B4CC.versanet.de] has joined #openttd
14:43:15  *** gelignite [~gelignite@i5387ad05.versanet.de] has joined #openttd
15:05:21  *** jjavaholic [~jjavaholi@grahamg63.plus.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
15:09:45  *** zeknurn [~sup@hd9483b0c.seveveb.dyn.perspektivbredband.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
15:10:05  *** chillcore [~chillcore@91.182.36.19] has quit [Quit: Only mortals are affected by fame and power.]
15:10:26  *** zeknurn [~sup@hd9483b0c.seveveb.dyn.perspektivbredband.net] has joined #openttd
15:43:00  *** Celestar [~Celestar@ip-109-43-2-14.web.vodafone.de] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
16:20:12  <samu> is anyone able to join my game http://www.openttd.org/en/server/89126
16:20:52  <samu> i am wondering why no one is joining, it was open 2 hours ago
16:29:30  <Alberth> ever looked at the server list?  http://www.openttd.org/en/servers
16:29:47  <Alberth> count the number of empty servers :p
16:33:27  <samu> :(, for two hours, no one even tried to join
16:33:34  <samu> nothing in console
16:35:17  <Alberth> "only ships" ?   doesn't sound very inviting
16:35:52  <samu> testing purposes
16:35:55  <samu> prices
16:35:57  <samu> mainly
16:36:15  <Alberth> sure, but people want to play, not test
16:38:40  <samu> can't test it too well because of that issue with middle tile on locks
16:38:46  <samu> but it's something
16:40:58  <samu> oh, speaking of that, I suppose I can submit the patch to bug tracker?
16:42:53  <Alberth> I guess you can
16:42:56  <samu> it's a patch that prices middle lock tile based on canal price, not on clearing a river tile
16:43:03  <samu> ok ty
16:43:25  <Alberth> I don't know whether it is worthwhile to include it
16:44:02  <samu> when used with base costs, the problem is exposed clearer
16:44:59  <samu> on it's own, makes no difference
16:53:32  <samu> ok, with default prices, this patch results in locks costing less when building on river, but costing more when building on bareland
16:56:16  <samu> it is basing the cost on canal which are still based on 5000, that's why it ends up costing more on bareland
16:56:38  <samu> 17500 becomes 22500
17:01:22  <samu> 17500 without patch, becomes 22500 when placed on bareland tiles
17:01:45  <samu> 17500 without patch, becomes 7500 when placed on river tiles
17:02:52  <samu> plus the added cost for clearing grass/debris, etc...
17:02:58  <samu> in the case of bareland
17:06:19  <samu> which type of report is it? bug, patch, feature request?
17:06:27  <samu> first time doing this
17:06:58  <Alberth> first check if there is a report bout it already
17:07:10  <samu> ok, it's a bit of the three
17:07:11  <Alberth> if there is, attach the patch to it
17:07:25  <Alberth> a bit of the three?
17:08:39  <samu> yes, bug is better exposed when used with a newgrf
17:08:52  <samu> without any newgrf, it's hard to identify it
17:09:20  <Alberth> oh, right
17:09:39  <Alberth> if there is no open issue about it, make a new one
17:09:41  <samu> the feature part is that it is changing prices
17:09:48  <Alberth> as you have a patch, label it patch
17:09:53  <samu> oki
17:10:06  <Alberth> 'feature request' means 'wanted feature'
17:10:25  <Alberth> not 'implemented feature'
17:10:38  <samu> ah, ok I get it
17:14:00  <samu> the patch is a little bit of opinionated
17:14:06  <samu> if you will
17:14:34  <samu> i'll tell about it in the description
17:14:56  <Alberth> that's why there is a description :)
17:25:49  <samu> interesting http://bugs.openttd.org/task/4711?string=lock+cost&project=1&search_name=&search_in_comments=1&search_in_details=1&search_for_all=1&type%5B0%5D=&sev%5B0%5D=&pri%5B0%5D=&due%5B0%5D=&reported%5B0%5D=&cat%5B0%5D=&status%5B0%5D=open&percent%5B0%5D=&opened=&dev=&closed=&duedatefrom=&duedateto=&changedfrom=&changedto=&openedfrom=&openedto=&closedfrom=&closedto=
17:25:53  <samu> oh crap, big link
17:33:31  *** sla_ro|master [~sla.ro@95.76.27.245] has joined #openttd
17:36:44  *** glx [~glx@000128ec.user.oftc.net] has joined #openttd
17:36:47  *** mode/#openttd [+v glx] by ChanServ
17:37:45  <samu> so when i search for locks, i get more crash results and other deadlocks rather than locks
17:37:55  <samu> no one likes ships here
17:37:57  *** FLHerne [~flh@dsl-217-155-24-22.zen.co.uk] has joined #openttd
17:42:18  *** liq3 [liq3@CPE-120-147-178-81.gdfw1.lon.bigpond.net.au] has quit []
17:43:04  <samu> Status: Unreproducable, there's a typo there
17:43:11  <samu> Unreproduceable
17:48:32  <samu> closest report that matches what this patch do is http://bugs.openttd.org/task/4711
17:48:38  <samu> only the comment though
17:48:59  <samu> http://bugs.openttd.org/task/4711#comment10345
17:49:02  <samu> this comment
17:50:54  <samu> submit there?
17:50:59  <samu> or create a new?
17:51:08  <samu> Alberth:
17:51:50  <Alberth> make a new one, and refer to FS#4711
17:52:05  <samu> ko
18:25:53  *** Plaete [~moffi@dsdf-4d0a4d56.pool.mediaWays.net] has joined #openttd
18:45:57  *** andythenorth [~Andy@cpc10-aztw26-2-0-cust867.18-1.cable.virginm.net] has joined #openttd
18:46:52  *** sla_ro|master [~sla.ro@95.76.27.245] has quit []
18:47:44  *** Plaete [~moffi@dsdf-4d0a4d56.pool.mediaWays.net] has quit [Quit: Nettalk6 - www.ntalk.de]
19:02:13  <samu> Alberth: I don't know if this is the actual file I need to attach - http://bugs.openttd.org/task/6233
19:02:53  <Alberth> looks ok
19:03:32  <Alberth> hmm, it fixes 2 things eh?
19:03:57  <Alberth> for the next time, we prefer 1 patch to fix 1 thing
19:05:07  <samu> oki
19:06:50  <roidal_> does the production rate of a farm decrease it some field get destroyed by a player?
19:07:00  <Alberth> no
19:13:35  *** shadowalkerAFK is now known as shadowalker
19:20:07  <roidal_> k
19:28:14  <andythenorth> o/
19:29:11  <roidal_> o/
19:41:21  *** namad7 [~aaaaa@pool-74-111-111-176.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net] has joined #openttd
19:42:25  *** namad7 [~aaaaa@pool-74-111-111-176.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net] has quit []
19:50:54  *** tokai|mdlx [~tokai@port-92-195-216-213.dynamic.qsc.de] has joined #openttd
19:55:52  *** tokai|noir [~tokai@00012860.user.oftc.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
20:18:30  *** andythenorth [~Andy@cpc10-aztw26-2-0-cust867.18-1.cable.virginm.net] has quit [Quit: andythenorth]
20:24:33  *** Alberth [~alberth@2001:981:c6c5:1:be5f:f4ff:feac:e11] has left #openttd []
20:28:30  *** FLHerne_ [~flh@dsl-217-155-24-22.zen.co.uk] has joined #openttd
20:31:43  *** tokai|mdlx [~tokai@port-92-195-216-213.dynamic.qsc.de] has quit [Quit: c('~' )o]
20:32:57  *** FLHerne [~flh@dsl-217-155-24-22.zen.co.uk] has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
20:42:53  *** Tirili [~chatzilla@kel30.kel.studentenwerk-goettingen.de] has joined #openttd
20:43:04  *** Wolf01 [~wolf01@95.232.38.183] has joined #openttd
20:43:31  <Wolf01> hi hi
20:46:17  <Wolf01> hah, today I attended a hobby modeling fair, the railroad layouts were awesome
20:47:22  <frosch123> does that mean transportable railroad setups?
20:47:34  <frosch123> or is it some kind of fixed installation
20:47:46  <Wolf01> transportable ones, but really big
20:48:19  <b_jonas> how many levels of nesting can there be where a railroad model is transported on a bigger railroad carriage?
20:49:53  <Wolf01> the fair is this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhhPQmBfItY
20:52:19  <FLHerne_> b_jonas: Not very many https://xkcd.com/878/
20:52:41  <b_jonas> is that the pianist one?
20:52:43  <samu> I'm bored
20:52:44  <b_jonas> no, it's not
20:53:01  <b_jonas> ah, better
20:54:00  <samu> it took 6 hours for someone to join my game and start building some ships
20:54:28  <samu> there's no appeal apparently
20:54:33  *** andythenorth [~Andy@cpc10-aztw26-2-0-cust867.18-1.cable.virginm.net] has joined #openttd
20:55:10  <samu> they're slow in generating profit
20:59:44  *** HerzogDeXtEr1 [~flex@i59F6A39E.versanet.de] has joined #openttd
21:05:01  *** HerzogDeXtEr [~flex@i59F6B4CC.versanet.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
21:05:17  <samu> he bankrupted :(
21:05:25  <samu> ships not easy
21:05:27  <samu> t.t
21:10:55  <samu> question: is it actually possible for a vehicle, say a single cargo ship, to store different types of cargo?
21:11:10  *** FLHerne_ is now known as FLHerne
21:11:32  <samu> say, there's 50 mail, 30 coal and 100 livestock at a dock
21:11:35  <FLHerne> samu: No
21:11:38  <samu> could the... ok
21:11:52  <FLHerne> samu: Aircraft can, because they cheat and use the shadow (!)
21:12:02  <FLHerne> So they can store two cargos
21:13:25  <samu> i was imagining this possibility
21:14:22  <Wolf01> add shadows to every vehicle! double the amount ov vehicles in game!
21:14:23  *** andythenorth [~Andy@cpc10-aztw26-2-0-cust867.18-1.cable.virginm.net] has quit [Quit: andythenorth]
21:14:29  <Wolf01> *of
21:16:09  <samu> the refit table would be changed somehow, into a different thing
21:16:22  <samu> "allowed cargos to load"
21:16:46  <samu> then toggle options for each type of cargo
21:17:09  <samu> ship would load whatever those options were set to at stations
21:17:20  <samu> but not those that were toggled off
21:17:41  <samu> to a max of 160 "cargo units"
21:18:04  <samu> but yeah... wishful thinking
21:21:53  *** shadowalker is now known as shadowalkerAFK
21:22:51  <samu> default cargo toggled on would be goods
21:33:20  *** Tirili [~chatzilla@kel30.kel.studentenwerk-goettingen.de] has quit [Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.91.1 [SeaMonkey 2.32.1/20150207155745]]
21:46:28  *** tokai [~tokai@00012860.user.oftc.net] has joined #openttd
21:46:31  *** mode/#openttd [+v tokai] by ChanServ
22:00:40  *** quorzom [~quorzom@cable-78-35-98-177.netcologne.de] has joined #openttd
22:30:23  *** supermop [~supermop@d110-33-170-165.sun801.vic.optusnet.com.au] has joined #openttd
22:36:53  <supermop> yo
22:43:17  *** Celestar [~Celestar@p5DE456CA.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #openttd
22:54:35  *** frosch123 [~frosch@frnk-4d00dc1d.pool.mediaWays.net] has quit [Quit: be yourself, except: if you have the opportunity to be a unicorn, then be a unicorn]
22:54:47  *** Celestar [~Celestar@p5DE456CA.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
22:55:30  <samu> i'm bored
22:57:10  <NGC3982> If you have nothing to do, i'd suggest fixing the we-can't-automate-Tasker-to-run-OpenTTD-by-autovoice issue.
22:57:22  <NGC3982> Should be a plethora of forum posts about it.
22:59:36  *** l4urenz [~l4urenz@D97B5AAC.cm-3-4b.dynamic.ziggo.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
23:00:39  *** oskari89 [oskari89@83-102-63-32.bb.dnainternet.fi] has quit []
23:03:56  *** liq3 [liq3@CPE-120-147-178-81.gdfw1.lon.bigpond.net.au] has joined #openttd
23:06:41  <samu> whats' that
23:12:49  *** l4urenz [~l4urenz@D97B5AAC.cm-3-4b.dynamic.ziggo.nl] has joined #openttd
23:14:30  *** Progman [~progman@p57A193B0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #openttd
23:17:01  <samu> look - https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=23B29F3DE45F6F1F!727&authkey=!AGBG83CxA0fiT8A&ithint=file%2cxlsx~
23:17:05  <samu> oops https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=23B29F3DE45F6F1F!727&authkey=!AGBG83CxA0fiT8A&ithint=file%2cxlsx
23:18:24  <samu> and now...
23:19:16  <samu> ... how do i link them
23:20:56  *** FLHerne [~flh@dsl-217-155-24-22.zen.co.uk] has quit [Quit: There's a real world out here!]
23:33:05  <Flygon__> samu: I'd use Dropbox
23:33:06  *** Flygon__ is now known as Flygon
23:33:11  <Flygon> Oh
23:33:16  <Flygon> It's a spreadsheet
23:33:21  <Flygon> Link works now
23:34:10  <samu> file name is called aqueduct but it's no longer aqueduct stuff only, it's a bit of everything water related
23:34:50  <samu> when I touch a depot tile
23:35:18  <samu> hmm nevermind, I suck at this
23:35:48  <samu> everything is interconnected
23:37:18  <samu> WATER_TILE_DEPOT can be placed on WATER_CLASS_SEA, WATER_CLASS_CANAL and WATER_CLASS_RIVER
23:37:46  <Wolf01> 'night
23:37:54  *** Wolf01 [~wolf01@0001288e.user.oftc.net] has quit [Quit: Once again the world is quick to bury me.]
23:39:07  <samu> WATER_CLASS_SEA can be WATER_TILE_CLEAR and WATER_TILE_COAST, but since this is a depot, it can't be WATER_TILE_COAST
23:41:37  <samu> WATER_CLASS_CANAL can be placed on WATER_CLASS_SEA and WATER_CLASS_RIVER
23:41:52  <samu> I don't know, I can't interconnect this
23:42:08  <samu> I can't see this~
23:45:30  *** gelignite [~gelignite@i5387ad05.versanet.de] has quit [Quit: http://bit.ly/1kso8Ta]
23:48:37  <samu> i must focus on WATER_TILE_DEPOT and WATER_CLASS_CANAL only, and what interconnect these two
23:51:39  <samu> bah
23:52:44  <samu> where does the game store tile class owners?
23:53:45  <samu> i give up, i don't know what to ask
23:56:45  *** roidal_ [~roland@193-154-140-192.adsl.highway.telekom.at] has quit [Quit: WeeChat 1.0.1]

Powered by YARRSTE version: svn-trunk