Times are UTC Toggle Colours
00:29:22 *** frosch has quit IRC 00:34:34 *** KenjiE20 has quit IRC 01:35:09 *** DanMacK has quit IRC 07:20:37 *** ODM has joined #openttdcoop.devzone 08:05:57 *** LordAro has joined #openttdcoop.devzone 08:17:32 *** LordAro has quit IRC 09:02:23 <Brot6> OpenGFX+ Landscape - Revision 61:f2bb022ce9e2: Feature: Make the 'company land' visible in transp... (planetmaker) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/ogfx-landscape/repository/revisions/f2bb022ce9e2 09:02:23 <Brot6> OpenGFX+ Landscape - Revision 62:f20422a09bde: Add: Allow company land also on steep slopes and d... (planetmaker) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/ogfx-landscape/repository/revisions/f20422a09bde 09:12:13 *** frosch123 has joined #openttdcoop.devzone 10:11:08 <Brot6> OpenGFX - Bug #2164 (Closed): inconsistent invisibility for industries (planetmaker) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/2164#change-6627 10:11:45 <Brot6> OpenGFX - Revision 650:7f9b4e3f1050: Fix #2153: Wrong, untranslated colour in some bridge GUI spr... (planetmaker) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/opengfx/repository/revisions/7f9b4e3f1050 10:11:45 <Brot6> OpenGFX - Bug #2153 (Reopened): tubular brigde (planetmaker) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/2153#change-6628 10:14:40 <Brot6> OpenGFX - Code Review #2573 (New): Check sprite #4462 (planetmaker) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/2573 10:50:05 *** KenjiE20 has joined #openttdcoop.devzone 11:33:38 <Ammler> I don't get it, the issue with different gap in depot view against map view is in both base sets, why can't it be fixed in openttd? 11:34:48 <Rubidium> because that really breaks *all* NewGRFs 11:35:50 <Ammler> not possible to implement something like "make gap if baseset"? 11:37:05 <Rubidium> that information is somewhat lost at that time 11:37:13 <Ammler> it also seems like I am the only one who would prefer perfect view on the map instead in the vehicle views 11:41:02 <planetmaker> Ammler: I'd prefer perfect view in both cases ;-) 11:43:57 <Ammler> planetmaker: well, you sound like the issue isn't solveable 11:44:14 <planetmaker> at least not easily nor quickly 11:44:37 <Ammler> so the workaround is to make the waggons as ugly as original 11:45:15 <Ammler> just to have nice depot views :-( 11:46:23 <planetmaker> DMK will draw them with buffers on both sides. Which will give 30px 11:47:28 <planetmaker> besides, it could in principle be feasible to extend the base graphics specs such that it allows defining the sprite size in depots, too. It's nothing which would break multiplayer 11:47:30 <Ammler> yeah, that sounds like the workaround I meant :-) 11:47:35 <planetmaker> The question is "how" 11:47:46 <planetmaker> and "how much work is that" 11:48:21 <Ammler> as Rubidium said, the information needs to be restored :-) 11:48:31 <Ammler> wouldn't hurt to have it anyway 11:49:49 <Ammler> oh, btw. nice improvement of the snow, will that also go to opengfx? 11:50:18 <Yexo> where do newgrf set the bit for the length in the depot window anyway? 11:51:07 <Ammler> why not simply use the sprite length, if no such bit is set? 11:51:26 <Yexo> sprite length is useless, as (especially for older grfs) not all sprites are cropped 11:54:36 <Ammler> on the other side, for me it sounds like you could fix the "growing bug" if the map view wouldn't have that gap 11:54:41 <Ammler> at least for basesets 12:02:31 *** frosch123 has quit IRC 12:03:10 <planetmaker> Ammler: if the feedback on that snow is positive, then 'yes' 12:03:52 <planetmaker> the problem with the altered snow is: you'll not have snow on the downward slopes of that level where I added it 12:08:17 *** frosch123 has joined #openttdcoop.devzone 12:11:33 <Ammler> planetmaker: that's the reason, Zeph didn't add it there? 12:11:48 <Ammler> but original has it, right? 12:11:55 <Ammler> maybe something to change in openttd? 12:12:59 <planetmaker> yes, that'll be the reason it wasn't done that way in OpenGFX. 12:14:00 <planetmaker> Changing that in OpenTTD basically just means to introduce yet another snow density layer, so that is not really an optimal solution IMHO either. 12:14:40 <Ammler> he, just saw in the ps game, ogfx+landscape does also replace the shores 12:14:40 <frosch123> let's try to make pm happy 12:15:05 <Brot6> TTDViewer - Revision 28:01114ddedfb5: -Add: FileFilters to the FileChooser. (frosch) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/ttdviewer/repository/revisions/01114ddedfb5 12:15:05 <Brot6> TTDViewer - Revision 29:cb7a4f5518d3: -Add: TTDPalette.getUnanimatedPalette(). (frosch) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/ttdviewer/repository/revisions/cb7a4f5518d3 12:15:05 <Brot6> TTDViewer - Revision 30:caab91ace314: -Codechange: Refactor TTDImage and TTDDisplay to not do any... (frosch) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/ttdviewer/repository/revisions/caab91ace314 12:15:05 <Brot6> TTDViewer - Revision 31:f66e69afd5d2: -Feature: Add 'save as' button. (frosch) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/ttdviewer/repository/revisions/f66e69afd5d2 12:15:08 <Brot6> TTDViewer - Revision 27:aba313421faf: -Change: Use only one instance of FileChooser for all TTDVi... (frosch) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/ttdviewer/repository/revisions/aba313421faf 12:15:38 <planetmaker> :-O 12:16:26 <planetmaker> Ammler: sure. It needs to. Or it can't offer alpine climate 12:16:37 <planetmaker> it still uses the old shores, I know 12:21:09 <planetmaker> Ammler: Zephyris suggested to replace the trees in OpenGFX by the ones from OpenGFX+Trees. What's your stance on that? 12:21:16 <planetmaker> I tend to agree that it might be a good idea 12:22:45 <frosch123> ah, i see, i messed up the commit dates while using qimport :p 12:23:42 <Ammler> planetmaker: when did you fix the intro images animation? 12:24:28 <Ammler> planetmaker: I like the ogfx+trees also more 12:24:39 <Ammler> but not sure, if that should be part of the baseset 12:24:56 <planetmaker> which animation? 12:25:11 <Ammler> the yellow blinking around the images 12:25:15 <planetmaker> And why should not the base set have the nicest available graphics which fit the style? 12:25:23 <Ammler> :-) 12:25:39 <planetmaker> Did you by chance enable full animation and it was always present? I'm not aware of fixing there anything 12:25:53 <Ammler> maybe 12:26:00 <Ammler> :-o 12:26:42 <Ammler> he, that is a reason to move those settings to the adv. settings gui 12:26:54 <Ammler> then you can change that on the start menu 12:28:22 <Ammler> the yellow light on the light tower does cycle too fast 12:29:06 <Ammler> I mean on the background, there should be a lag from right to left 12:29:26 <Brot6> OpenGFX+ Landscape - Feature Request #2309: Alpine climate (planetmaker) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/2309#change-6629 12:30:05 <Brot6> OpenGFX+ Industries - Feature Request #2562: Ground aware "stranger" industries (planetmaker) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/2562#change-6630 12:37:21 <Ammler> ah no, it is fine, there are 2 lights 12:38:54 <Brot6> OpenGFX+ Landscape - Feature Request #2309: Alpine climate (Ammler) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/2309#change-6631 12:39:14 <planetmaker> ^ of course 12:50:27 <Brot6> OpenGFX - Revision 657:d198d73edf53: Change: Apply the changes of r645 also to the arctic farm wi... (planetmaker) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/opengfx/repository/revisions/d198d73edf53 13:06:54 <Ammler> [14:25] <planetmaker> And why should not the base set have the nicest available graphics which fit the style? <-- because it is my personal feeling, and it is a very change of style 13:07:36 <Ammler> (make a vote on tt-forums? 13:09:06 <planetmaker> why do all people always want votes? 13:09:08 <Ammler> what do you think about bundle the ogfx+ newgrf with opengfx? 13:09:27 <planetmaker> how and where? bannas doesn't allow it 13:09:38 <Terkhen> I have seen a few cases in which people confused "base graphics set" and "NewGRF" 13:09:57 <planetmaker> merging them codewise might in parts make sense. Especially for OpenGFX+ Landscape 13:10:05 <planetmaker> But probably also others 13:10:12 <planetmaker> They share lots of graphics 13:10:18 <Ammler> well, all ogfx+ newgrfs 13:10:21 <planetmaker> Still I'm not sure it'd be a good approach 13:10:28 <Terkhen> given the similarity of the names "OpenGFX" and "OpenGFX+", we would get confusing reports if they are distributed together 13:10:41 <Terkhen> all OpenGFX+ newgrfs could be distributed together without problems IMO 13:10:43 <Ammler> which doesn't hurt, does it? 13:11:22 <Ammler> the people behind ogfx+ and ogfx are the same (mainly pm :-P 13:11:37 <planetmaker> well... it'd not be really helpful, if the bug reports were addressing the wrong (new)grf 13:11:43 <Terkhen> do you mean the reports? they can be quite confusing 13:12:23 <Terkhen> I remember someone a few days ago (maybe yesterday) who said that he installed opengfx and then he did get temperate graphics in subarctic 13:12:42 <planetmaker> :-) 13:12:46 <Ammler> and that is bad? 13:12:47 <Terkhen> I still don't know if he had opengfx+ landscape enabled or if that was his way of saying that there was no snow 13:12:55 <planetmaker> it's definitely not helpful, Ammler 13:13:02 <Terkhen> Ammler: yes, because we have no clue of what might be the problem 13:13:12 <Ammler> so you think about removing ogfx+ from the newgrfs? 13:13:39 <Terkhen> no 13:13:49 <planetmaker> Uhm, they are NewGRFs... 13:13:55 <Terkhen> I just think that distributing opengfx and opengfx+ together would cause more reports like that one 13:14:10 <Ammler> you guys should really learn to ignore such reports instead always react immediately with things which are quite disturbing for regulars 13:14:21 <planetmaker> Also, Ammler where do you want to distribute it jointly? Bananas doesn't allow that 13:14:26 <Terkhen> what things? 13:14:39 <Ammler> confusing bug reports 13:14:52 <Terkhen> with what things do we react? 13:15:03 <Ammler> just ignore those until they aren't confusing, someone else can bring light in those 13:15:39 <planetmaker> who would that be if not those people who actually write and maintain the programme? 13:15:43 <Terkhen> we should do what we can to reduce confusion to a minimum, it is better for the user and for us 13:16:11 <Ammler> but it is bad for the advanced user 13:16:39 <planetmaker> why is 'reduced confusion' bad for the 'advanced' user? 13:17:03 <planetmaker> everyone profits IMHO from a clear concept 13:17:05 <Ammler> in cases, where you change code to reach that :-) 13:17:50 <planetmaker> you're basically asking to keep all UI design attrocities intact forever :-( 13:18:30 <planetmaker> and basically call the game 'done' and only add few pieces which don't intersect existing stuff at all 13:18:33 <Terkhen> I'm confused, are we talking about opengfx+ or that problem with the visualization of trains? 13:18:43 <Ammler> well, at least not change UI based on beginners 13:19:03 <Terkhen> what UI changes? 13:20:32 <Ammler> Terkhen: the main goal of openttd devs is to make the game quite comfortable for beginners 13:20:52 <Ammler> that is not always comform for the rest 13:21:45 <Terkhen> for example? 13:22:12 <Ammler> adding features which take over gameplay 13:22:20 <Terkhen> which ones? 13:23:04 <Ammler> hmm, it is hard to list those things without making people angry :-( 13:23:42 <Terkhen> I need context, I am a bit lost with the topic right now because I thought we were talking about opengfx+ :) 13:24:00 <Ammler> yeah, let us go back to ogfx+ :-) 13:24:35 <Terkhen> as you prefer, but I don't mind talking about what features are implemented in openttd either 13:27:38 <Ammler> I think, if you really don't like reports related to opengfx, you need to remove that from ogfx+ 13:29:10 <Terkhen> I don't have any problems with reports related to opengfx, the only problem is the time lost (both for the reporter and for us) in the confusion 13:29:17 <Terkhen> right now it is something minor 13:29:36 <Terkhen> I merely pointed that if opengfx and opengfx+ were distributed together the confusions would be more frequent 13:31:23 <Ammler> somehow they belong togehter, so there is no confusion :-) 13:32:53 <Terkhen> they belong together, but I don't see how that prevents confusions like the one I mentioned earlier 13:33:03 <Ammler> [15:14] <planetmaker> Also, Ammler where do you want to distribute it jointly? Bananas doesn't allow that <-- the bundle on openttd.org and distro packages 13:35:55 <Ammler> main distribution of ogfx isn't bananas 13:37:14 <planetmaker> but... what would be the benefit of such bundle? 13:38:14 <planetmaker> Yes, obviously the player gets some NewGRFs straight away. Which at least some people believe are worthwhile 13:38:42 <planetmaker> But wouldn't the better approach be to add some kind of recommendations or quality criterion to the bananans entries? 13:42:45 <Ammler> bananas is out of our scope, nobody is able to improve that afaik 13:44:24 <planetmaker> not? 13:44:27 <Ammler> and it would symbolize that it is highly recommend to use the ogfx+ newgrfs together with opengfx 13:47:08 <Ammler> hehe, or maybe merge those again to one newgrf :-P 14:03:02 <planetmaker> The graphics might be a good example of what could use a subrepository maybe... 14:05:09 <planetmaker> Then updating them would update all associated projects. The code is destinct anyway 14:11:58 <Ammler> planetmaker: to update the shores on ogfx+landscape, you should be able to simply copy the sprites png from ogfx, are you? 14:13:01 <planetmaker> and adjust the filename referenced 14:23:10 *** andythenorth has joined #openttdcoop.devzone 14:24:46 <andythenorth> afternoun 14:37:07 <Terkhen> hi andythenorth 14:40:30 <andythenorth> what's new? 14:43:42 <Terkhen> not much on my part :P 15:01:51 *** Brot6 has quit IRC 15:02:30 *** Brot6 has joined #openttdcoop.devzone 15:22:05 *** KenjiE20 has quit IRC 15:23:11 *** KenjiE20 has joined #openttdcoop.devzone 16:00:45 *** andythenorth has quit IRC 16:07:31 *** andythenorth has joined #openttdcoop.devzone 16:10:08 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Feature #1893 (Feedback): Class 170 'Turbostar' (welshdragon) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/1893#change-6632 16:11:22 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Feature #1892 (Feedback): Class 220 'Voyager'/Class 221 'Super Voyager... (welshdragon) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/1892#change-6633 16:18:45 *** supermop has joined #openttdcoop.devzone 16:19:18 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Bug #2481: Class 365 Bug (welshdragon) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/2481#change-6634 16:25:02 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Feature #2489: Class 159 'Wessex Turbo' (welshdragon) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/2489#change-6635 16:25:02 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Feature #2488: Class 158 'Express Sprinter' (welshdragon) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/2488#change-6636 16:26:12 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Bug #2482: Class 373 Eurostar Livery Fire Red Fix. (welshdragon) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/2482#change-6637 16:26:57 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Feature #2480: Class 43 HST (welshdragon) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/2480#change-6638 16:27:57 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Feature #2479: Class 37 'Deltic' (welshdragon) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/2479#change-6639 16:28:03 <Brot6> mode change on /home/hg/ukbusset 16:30:18 *** frosch has joined #openttdcoop.devzone 16:32:49 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Bug #1927 (Closed): Class 365/465/465 (welshdragon) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/1927#change-6641 16:33:30 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Bug #1927 (Closed): Class 365/465/465 (welshdragon) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/1927#change-6641 16:33:30 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Feature #1897 (Assigned): Class 365 (welshdragon) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/1897#change-6642 16:35:59 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Feature #1897: Class 365 (welshdragon) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/1897#change-6643 16:36:38 *** frosch123 has quit IRC 16:37:02 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Feature #1897 (Assigned): Class 365 (welshdragon) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/1897#change-6642 16:38:39 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Feature #1897: Class 365 (welshdragon) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/1897#change-6643 16:40:52 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Bug #1927 (Closed): Class 365/465/465 (welshdragon) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/1927#change-6641 16:40:52 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Feature #1897: Class 365 (welshdragon) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/1897#change-6643 16:40:52 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Bug #2481 (Rejected): Class 365 Bug (welshdragon) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/2481#change-6645 16:42:02 *** andythenorth has left #openttdcoop.devzone 16:42:03 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Code Review #1925 (Assigned): backup.push to 2cc (welshdragon) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/1925#change-6646 16:43:24 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Feature #1911: class 465 (welshdragon) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/1911#change-6647 16:45:43 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Support #2574 (Feedback): Coder AWOL (welshdragon) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/2574 16:52:15 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Code Review #1925: backup.push to 2cc (Ammler) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/1925#change-6649 16:55:05 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Code Review #1925: backup.push to 2cc (welshdragon) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/1925#change-6650 16:55:50 <welshdragon> oh dear god 16:55:59 <welshdragon> my irc bouncer just spammed me :( 16:56:10 <welshdragon> Ammler: you here my good man? 16:58:35 <Brot6> British Rail OpenTTD Set - Code Review #1925: backup.push to 2cc (Ammler) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/1925#change-6651 16:59:22 <Ammler> we can chat with ticket, no need to use irc :-P 17:00:09 <welshdragon> :P 17:01:03 *** Sacro has joined #openttdcoop.devzone 17:01:57 <welshdragon> Ammler, but I then get an email :( 17:02:02 <welshdragon> (as will Sacro) 17:02:08 <Sacro> ? 17:02:44 <welshdragon> support tickets that are assigned/watched by you generate emails for *every* change 17:02:49 <welshdragon> This can be changed 17:03:21 <Ammler> well, tell remove the backup.push file 17:03:41 <Ammler> I will then strip it from 2cctrainset 17:16:43 <welshdragon> I'm trying to remove it now 17:17:07 <welshdragon> i think DJNekkid has copied it for the logos 17:18:29 <Ammler> logos? 17:18:34 <Brot6> ogfx-landscape: update from r60 to r62 done - http://bundles.openttdcoop.org/ogfx-landscape/nightlies/r62 17:18:55 <Ammler> he just copied .devzone from 2ccset 17:19:28 <Ammler> it is quite stupid to copy .devzone around as it has repo specific data only 17:19:38 <Brot6> opengfx: update from r656 to r657 done - http://bundles.openttdcoop.org/opengfx/nightlies/r657 17:20:16 <Brot6> ttdviewer: update from r26 to r31 done - http://bundles.openttdcoop.org/ttdviewer/nightlies/r31 17:20:17 <Brot6> Following repos didn't need a nightlies update: 2cctrainset (r750), 32bpp-extra (r40), ai-admiralai (r75), ai-aroai (r33), ailib-common (r21), ailib-direction (r17), ailib-list (r32), ailib-string (r29), ailib-tile (r16), airportsplus (r73), basecosts (r25), belarusiantowns (r8), bros (r52), chips (r138), comic-houses (r71), firs (r1989), fish (r617), frenchtowns (r6), german-townnames (r33), grfcodec (r828), grfpack (r279), heqs 17:20:17 <Brot6> (r605), indonesiantowns (r41), manindu (r7), metrotrackset (r56), narvs (r37), newgrf_makefile (r285), nml (r1323), nutracks (r186), ogfx-industries (r53), ogfx-rv (r80), ogfx-trains (r239), ogfx-trees (r42), openmsx (r97), opensfx (r97), smts (r19), snowlinemod (r49), spanishtowns (r10), swedishrails (r202), swisstowns (r22), transrapidtrackset (r15), ttrs (r36), worldairlinersset (r671) 17:44:45 <Brot6> DevZone Help Center - Revision 136:66f8c16ca454: [Compiler] Update: new home and hgsubversion sup... (Ammler) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/home/repository/revisions/66f8c16ca454 18:07:22 *** andythenorth has joined #openttdcoop.devzone 18:44:36 <Brot6> DevZone Help Center - Revision 137:81c9f02b9acb: [Compiler] backup and branch support for mq (Ammler) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/home/repository/revisions/81c9f02b9acb 18:44:36 <Brot6> DevZone Help Center - Revision 138:deca6f417cfc: [HG] backup convert script (depreciated) (Ammler) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/home/repository/revisions/deca6f417cfc 18:44:36 <Brot6> DevZone Help Center - Revision 139:bf494078fe63: [HG hook] remove .grf from "bad" file list (Ammler) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/home/repository/revisions/bf494078fe63 18:49:33 <planetmaker> hu? 18:50:12 <Ammler> planetmaker: just backup old changes :-) 18:59:53 *** Sacro has quit IRC 19:01:19 *** andythenorth_ has joined #openttdcoop.devzone 19:03:46 <Brot6> test: update from to r95 done - http://bundles.openttdcoop.org/test/push/r95 19:05:28 *** Sacro has joined #openttdcoop.devzone 19:08:35 *** andythenorth has quit IRC 19:11:44 <Brot6> test: update from to t1 done - http://bundles.openttdcoop.org/test/releases/t1 19:15:14 <Brot6> test: update from r95 to r97 done - http://bundles.openttdcoop.org/test/push/r97 19:16:29 <Ammler> hmm, it works nice for me :-) 19:16:36 <Ammler> why doesn't it for others? 19:17:36 *** andythenorth_ has quit IRC 19:18:42 *** andythenorth has joined #openttdcoop.devzone 19:22:59 <Brot6> DevZone Help Center - Bug #2465: DevZone compile failed (Ammler) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/2465#change-6652 19:31:28 <Brot6> FIRS Industry Replacement Set - Bug #2575 (New): Why so many lime kilns <1900 ? (andythenorth) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/issues/2575 20:01:11 <Brot6> FISH - Revision 618:1b7c8fcf9caa: Change: additional utility vessel (unfinished) (andythenorth) @ http://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/fish/repository/revisions/1b7c8fcf9caa 20:11:35 <Brot6> Backup test: abort: no suitable response from remote hg! 20:16:45 *** DanMacK has joined #openttdcoop.devzone 20:33:07 *** frosch has quit IRC 20:52:36 *** andythenorth has left #openttdcoop.devzone 20:58:36 *** DanMacK has quit IRC 21:50:15 *** ODM has quit IRC 23:36:22 *** Sacro_ has joined #openttdcoop.devzone 23:42:03 *** Sacro has quit IRC 23:44:28 *** Sacro_ has quit IRC